Teaching Bitcoin in Schools – The Bitcoin Academy

Are you raising a future Bitcoiner? A new startup has just surfaced with one vision: to educate our children about Bitcoin. How will this happen, you ask? That is where The Bitcoin Academy and Bitcoin Bootcamp come in. The idea is very simple and will allow students of all ages to learn about Bitcoin and Cryptography in both the classroom and online.

According to founder Morgan Rockwell, “The Bitcoin Academy has a goal of creating a network of classrooms online & in the real world including real dedicated classrooms in major cities around the world. We will organize business clubs and foundations, meetups and conferences, seminars and hangouts, all dedicated to teaching the world of Crypto Currency and Bitcoin as a new means of mathematical & financial expression and freedom.”

“There are actually two businesses, The Bitcoin Academy and Bitcoin Bootcamp. The vision for these began when I started thinking about how to introduce Bitcoin to the brick and mortar world. I started creating devices that are open source in both hardware and software that could make a machine accept Bitcoin. I feel that The Bitcoin Academy is a priority to all Bitcoin supporters. I feel there is a missing aspect of education that teaches kids the benefits and how to use Bitcoin. We need to get back to teaching kids math and science again.”

This exciting idea focuses on partnering with schools around the nation. It will start by creating classes dedicated to Bitcoin and crypto currency, then will partner with a school who adds the class to their curriculum. The first classes are planned to be held in Portland, Oregon schools by contacting and partnering with district trustees in the area. The Bitcoin Academy will focus on partnering with schools K-12 while Bitcoin Bootcamp will focus on adopting classes into private schools. The adoption of The Bitcoin Academy curriculum in a single school will allow them to create similar classes in other schools around the nation, and the curriculum will increase as the number of supporting schools increases.

Although The Bitcoin Academy is certainly in the early stages, there is no question that the instruction of Bitcoin and crypto currency in schools would be a huge breakthrough for the Bitcoin community. This idea will require teachers, volunteers, the support of schools, and support from individuals. Currently The Bitcoin Academy has a few volunteer teachers and is receiving resumes from teachers interested in teaching at the school. In the future, Morgan hopes The Bitcoin Academy and Bitcoin Bootcamp will be franchised throughout the nation. “All of this takes money, or better yet Bitcoin.”

The Bitcoin Academy is accepting donations to help make the idea a reality. The donations made will go to creating an entire curriculum and providing students with necessary ‘school supplies’ (mining hardware, labs, networks, computers, etc.) while bringing insight into the evolving world of money, computers, and business. “The goal is to have the facility and business completely set up before the end of the year.”  This will all occur in a school setting and will be open to any student.

“The Bitcoin Academy provides a stepping stone for our students to reach the future they envision.”

All donations to The Bitcoin Academy can be made at The Bitcoin Academy website, GoFundMe, or by using Bitcoin Starter.

http://www.gofundme.com/43q6uo

www.thebitcoinacademy.com

Morgan also founded Bitcoin Kinetics and created the first washing machine to accept Bitcoin.

 

Tradehill Confirms Trading Suspension

One day after customers reported receiving emails indicating that Bitcoin exchange Tradehill was closing shop for the second time in as many years, the trading service confirmed on its website that it had “temporarily suspended trading.” Despite having publicly placed an emphasis on over-compliance with financial regulations in the United States, Tradehill now has a chance to break its own record as the only Bitcoin exchange to successfully reopen after a shutdown. Tradehill established that record in March of this year when it relaunched after an eleven month hibernation, distinguishing it from the host of exchanges that have closed permanently.

The San Francisco based company made the news last week when it announced it was opening an account with the Internet Archive Federal Credit Union. In the emails shared by customers on Wednesday, Tradehill stated that it was “suspending its relationship” with the IAFCU, as well as suspending Bitcoin trading. The IAFCU had notably facilitated the return of customers funds stuck in financial purgatory after another Bitcoin exchange, Bitfloor, was left out in the cold by its bank.

Tradehill has previously touted a catered to strict regulatory compliance by only allowing customers with over $10,000 to open a trading account and rigorously applying “Know Your Customer” rules. The most recent suspension of operations by a company providing a conduit between the legacy financial system and Bitcoin is part of a growing trend in the United States that sees entrepreneurs stymied by a banking and financial environment wary of interacting with Bitcoin.

In the statement on their website, Tradehill cited “banking and regulatory issues” as the reason for their hiatus, but did not clarify the nature of those issues. The announcement also noted that Tradehill had only just this month registered with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as a Money transmitter. FinCEN’s Records show that the registration was received on August 13, 2013. However, business engaged in money transmission are also required to obtain licences from each state they do business in, which often involve prohibitive surety bonds and application fees.

Separately, the email to customers indicated that Tradehill would be able to allow withdrawal of a customers US dollar account balance via bank wire, and encouraged them to contact the personal account manager that Tradehill assigns to each account holder. Both announcements indicate that the company plans to resume operations after it resolves its unspecified difficulties.

UPDATE

Tradehill CEO Jered Kenna has posted an announcement on reddit noting that the IAFCU  “has experienced operational and regulatory issues and we are no longer able to continue our relationship at this time.”

He ended the announcement by saying “We look forward to resuming operations soon.”

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1lds68/tradehill_temporarily_suspending_trading_iafcu/

The full text of the announcement found on Tradehill’s website is included below for posterity.

Tradehill Moving Forward

Many of you have come to know Tradehill as the digital currency exchange of choice over the last six months. We have appreciated your patronage and have delighted in providing a reliable service to help you reach deep liquidity in the Bitcoin market. We have recently made the decision to temporarily suspend trading on the Tradehill platform, due to banking and regulatory issues. This decision has not been made lightly and we regret having to take such action. However, we embrace the silver lining of our situation and plan to take this opportunity to upgrade, improve, and polish our trading platform.

Tradehill registered with FinCEN in August 2013 and is actively engaging with banks and regulators to continue development of future business products and practices.

We would like to thank our clients, current and past partners, supporters, and advocates for all their continued support. The Bitcoin space has proven to be an exciting and dynamic environment. We are proud to have the opportunity to be at the forefront of this new domain.

For those eager to stay informed of our trading platform and new product releases, please sign-up for our e-mail list below and we’ll keep you updated.

 

Regulators Taking a Hiatus to Learn a Bit More About Bitcoin

On Monday and Tuesday of this week, representatives from the Bitcoin Foundation met successfully met with regulators and Capitol Hill Staff. Without a clear foreshadowing of how successful the series of meetings would be, the outcome was a “smashing success” according to Chair of the Foundation’s Regulator Affairs Committee, Marco Santori who provided a follow-up to the community. Santori explained, “Our message was straightforward: It is critical that the industry and the regulators work together to create a safe and sane regulatory environment for Bitcoin businesses in the United States,” and proceeded to highlight that the Foundation representatives took some tough questions but were pleased that a dialogue was established.

Monday’s meeting with regulators was spearheaded by an invitation to a private conference held by FinCEN in Washington, D.C. Regulators included high-level representatives from FinCEN, IRS, FDIC, Federal Reserve, OCC, FBI, DEA, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security and more. Foundation attendees included Santori, Patrick Murck, Peter Vessenes, Brian Klein, and Jim Harper. Foundation attendees spoke for an hour on Bitcoin the protocol, bitcoin the currency, regulatory challenges, enforcement and investigation methodologies and took questions. While no final verdict can be reached from this first round of hopefully many meetings, Bitcoin Foundation Chairman, Peter Vessenes, stated in reference to the first round of meetings, “It’s a kickoff of engagement” to hint at more meetings down the road.

Santori also clarified that during the meeting “The Foundation did not endorse any particular investigative or regulatory methods, nor did we lobby for any particular policy position.”  Foundation leadership views this first meeting as one to develop a relationship in lieu of pushing for particular policy in the present. As Bitcoin continues to develop, we can hope that this strategy of relationship building will buy time prior to any further regulatory action on behalf of FinCEN and additional regulatory agencies. As the Bitcoin Foundation moves forward in forming relationships with policymakers and regulators, the goal will be for a Bitcoin community-wide consensus before any particular policy preferences are pushed. The Bitcoin Foundation encourages Bitcoin community members to voice their views, concerns, and questions to contribute to the dialogue.

Bitcoin Magazine encourages you to stay up to date on developments. There are many current events to keep track of and the Bitcoin community is only as strong as its active membership base. Please let us know if you have any questions and we will look forward to being of assistance!

 

Bitcoin: A Great Unifier

What comes to mind first when one thinks about a digital, decentralized currency? For myself, it is the unifying reach Bitcoin has around the world and back. Who would have thought that Satoshi Nakamoto’s initial white paper from October 2008 would spark a revolution of unification, ingenuity and cross cultural, cross race, cross political, cross faith, and cross ideological lines.  After first learning about Bitcoin I initially could not wrap my mind around the idea that I could send money from my cell phone to my relatives in Norway, friends in Washington, DC or my family in New Jersey with just the scan of a QR code. Bitcoin leads us to embrace a world of interconnectedness where we are prompted to and benefit much from learning from people around the world who may be different on paper from us but share a common desire for economic liberty, ingenuity and freedom of speech.

When I began to research further, my eyes were opened to the opportunities Bitcoin provides all people. As an electronic cash system, no attention is paid to one’s faith, race, and gender, as the only connection is one that all people can share, the Internet. As I learned more about just how prudent it would be to get involved in such a currency to promote peace and interconnectedness around the world, I was growing tired of the partisanship on Capitol Hill.

Bitcoin and the ideals behind the currency and community prompt individuals to work together and share ideas from one nation to another between one individual with another regardless of background. In a limited government, free market, liberty promoting community such as that of the Bitcoin ecosystem, much can be accomplished as no gender based, faith based, cultural based, or even socioeconomic based glasses need to be worn.

In addition to providing tremendous economic opportunities, Bitcoin provides a point of connection where two, three, or more can come together and share ideas of best practices having a common bond of wanting an expedient and efficient electronic cash system. Having worked now exclusively in the Bitcoin space for several months, I am amazed at the variety of individuals I have met from around the world of different educational backgrounds, political ideologies, nationalities and life goals. With the common point of interest in Bitcoin, we have been able to collaborate on projects and together forward the goals of limited government intervention in the economy, freedom of speech, individual rights and liberties, the cause of ingenuity. Most importantly, we have come together to work to preserve and protect the merits of Bitcoin and educate on why and how Bitcoin is one of the best unifiers one can find to bridge a gender, international, cultural, political, educational, career, socioeconomic, faith based, and even generational gap.

I do not know about you, but I hope to continue to learn more from others in the Bitcoin space and I look forward to watching this community growth. On behalf of Bitcoin Magazine, I encourage you to continue to engage and get involved in the Bitcoin community. My one guarantee: be prepared to be challenged, grow and learn much in a short period of time. Why wait?!

 

Trustless Bitcoin Anonymity Here at Last

With representatives from the Bitcoin Foundation currently meeting high-level officials from a number of US regulatory agencies, the topic of Bitcoin anonymity has once again taken center stage. In part as a deliberate effort to downplay Bitcoin’s privacy aspects to regulators, in part as a result of recent revelations from Edward Snowden about the scope of the NSA’s digital surveillance initiatives, and finally in part due to new research regarding the Bitcoin transaction graph itself, the current mood is that Bitcoin may be far less private than we thought. On August 14, researchers from George Mason University released a regulatory primer on Bitcoin heavily downplaying its anonymity. On August 26, Vice released an article “describing researchers’ success in de-anonymizing some Bitcoin transactions“, and a similar story ran on Businessweek the next day. However, there are many who see this lack of anonymity as a problem – and today, two Bitcoin developers in Spain have come up with a solution.

[youtuber youtube=’http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr6DeziHdFs’]

De-Anonymizing Bitcoin

First, the problem. As commonly understood, Bitcoin’s privacy model is as follows. All Bitcoin transactions are public by necessity; otherwise it would be possible to release many separate transactions sending the same money multiple times, and the fraud would not be discovered until much later. Rather, the privacy of the Bitcoin system comes from the fact that, although transactions are public, the identities behind the transactions are not. Anyone looking at the blockchain can see “1Mcqmmnx send 1.2321 BTC to 1V1tAL”, but what they do not see is exactly who sent the bitcoins to whom. It could be grandma sending bitcoins to buy her grandson a new computer from the BitcoinStore, it could be a vendor cashing out of Silk Road, or it could simply be MtGox sending bitcoins to itself.

However, for the past several years researchers have been showing that this privacy model is not quite so perfect as it seems. In 2011, researchers Fergal Reid and Martin Harrigan released an analysis that, among other things, attempted to trace a 25,000 BTC theft from June 2011. The paper produced no results useful to law enforcement, but was able to follow the money a considerable distance in some places. More recently, researchers in Zurich expanded on Bitcoin de-anonymization techniques, and most recently in August a group of researchers from George Mason University and the University of California, San Diego released a paper entitled “A Fistful of Bitcoins: Characterizing Payments Among Men with No Names“, that appears to successfully follow the money from some Bitcoin thefts all the way to a Bitcoin exchange, which in theory can be asked by law enforcement to reveal the thief’s identity.

Bitcoin de-anonymization essentially relies on one fundamental insight. Given just a set of information about people and a set of information about Bitcoin transactions, with no information connecting the two, it is indeed very hard to figure out which addresses belong to which person. However, as soon as you have even one anchor – some Bitcoin transaction or address tied to a particular real person or event, from there it becomes possible to “follow the money” and gather up a load of other information as well. One might discover the Bitcoin address of that user’s employer, favorite businesses, customers, and much more – or, knowing more anchors, one might quickly figure out what that user’s favorite businesses are. Aside from simply “following the money”, there are also two more advanced tools that Bitcoin sleuths can use.

First, there is a concept called the closure. The closure of an address is defined recursively as follows:

  1. An address is in its own closure.
  2. If address A is in the closure, and there exists a transaction using coins from address A and address B as inputs, then address B is also in the closure.

To calculate the closure of an address, simply repeatedly apply the definition starting from that address until you stop adding new addresses. The power of this concept is the following: all addresses in a closure are almost certainly owned by the same user. If a transaction has multiple inputs, the reason is almost always that a user needed to send some amount of money somewhere but did not have the entire amount in one address, and so the wallet software had to select inputs from two or more different addresses to make the payment. With this tool, if you can show that even one address belongs to a particular person (eg. if you are a merchant accepting a payment from them) then you can potentially uncover most of their entire wallet.

Second, the paper also introduces a few heuristic algorithms for detecting what are known as “change addresses“. Change addresses are used by Bitcoin wallets to send extra money to when spending transaction outputs; for example, if you receive 50 BTC and then proceed to spend 1 BTC, the remaining 49 BTC goes to a change address freshly generated by your wallet. Doing this, rather than sending the 49 BTC back to the original address is done to increase privacy, and much of the paper deals with the difficult question of how one can automatically distinguish between change addresses and the intended output of a transaction. By doing this, the researchers were able to go much further than with closures alone, often following long chains of transactions hundreds of steps, and ultimately their research was successful: they were able to trace some stolen funds all the way to a Bitcoin exchange.

The Solution

The main solution to the problem so far has been mixing services, such as the one at blockchain.info and the one integrated into Silk Road. A mixing service works as follows. A user provides the mixing service with a destination address, and is given an input address to send their bitcoins to. Thousands of users from around the world send their bitcoins into their mixer, the mixer internally shuffles them, and then sends to each user’s destination address the same quantity of bitcoins (but not the same bitcoins) that they sent in, minus a small fee. The link between the input address and the destination exists nowhere in the blockchain, and in theory the mixing service itself destroys this information as soon as mixing is complete. However, the anonymization comes at the cost of trust. Users need to trust the mixer not to reveal the link between the input and destination, and they also need to trust the mixer not to steal the bitcoins outright. Even worse, if the mixer did steal some bitcoins, there would be no way to prove that it did.

Now, Bitcoin developers Amir Taaki and Pablo Martin developed with a new solution to Bitcoin anonymity: a semi-decentralized, trust-free mixing system. The underlying idea of a decentralized mixer is not new, and all schemes proposed so far, including this one, work similarly. Some number of people, all wanting to mix some specific quantity of bitcoins (say 0.01 BTC), come together over some communications channel and construct a single transaction, with each person contributing 0.01 BTC as an input and receiving 0.01 BTC as an output. The order of the inputs and outputs is shuffled, so there is no information about which input corresponds to each output in the blockchain. The challenge is, however, making sure that the link between each participant’s input and output is not known to the other participants in the mix as well. One solution was presented by Oliver Coutu at the Bitcoin conference in May 2013, using secure multiparty computation to construct the transaction without anyone being able to see exactly which input or output any other person contributed. However, the underlying mathematics is complex (although not nearly so complex as Zerocoin), and so far no easily usable implementation has been created.

The solution that Taaki and Martin implemented is much simpler. The protocol is fully described on the project’s web page, and roughly works as follows:

  1. N people get together and agree to mix X bitcoins, and one of them sends the values N and X and a “room ID” to a central facilitator.
  2. Everyone sends a message containing the room ID and their destination address to the facilitator, using an anonymizing network like Tor to make the communication.
  3. The facilitator sends everyone an acknowledgement once all N people sent in their destination addresses.
  4. Everyone anonymously sends a message containing the room ID and their input address to the facilitator.
  5. The facilitator waits for everyone to send X BTC to their input address, and then constructs a transaction using these inputs and sending X BTC to each of the destination addresses. The facilitator then sends the transaction for everyone to sign.
  6. Everyone checks that the transaction sends the right amount of bitcoins to their destination address and, if the transaction checks out, anonymously sends their signature to the facilitator.
  7. The facilitator broadcasts the signed transaction.

As mentioned above, there is nothing particularly original about the protocol; in fact, Taaki and Martin first discovered the idea from a forum thread created by Bitcoin developer Gregory Maxwell describing the concept under the name of “CoinJoin”. Rather, the magic lies in the implementation. The pair were able to use the Bitcoin toolkit SX, developed by Taaki himself, to quickly implement the transaction handling side of the application within hours – a process which would have taken many times longer had they tried to write their own code or reuse code from a Bitcoin client like Armory or Electrum.

Where the implementation outshines previous attempts at accomplishing the same thing is ease of use. Taaki and Martin specifically created a simple graphical user interface; a user need only enter their input address, facilitator URL and output address, and the system handles everything automatically. “We’ve delivered usable software, simple for grandma (money goes in, money goes out), requires no blockchain or bitcoind, easy to install and trustless,” Taaki writes. For those interested, he has also produced a video depicting the entire process from start to finish; it only takes one minute to go through all the steps. “It’s experimental software,” Taaki says, “but it’s usable right now.” Anyone interested in running the mixer can simply download the source code and read the instructions here. Semi-decentralized, trustless Bitcoin anonymity has just been democratized.

Taaki and Martin’s implementation of CoinJoin has been criticized for being “centralized”, but in fact the level of centralization is trivial. The central party does not learn which input corresponds to which output (as people send their messages at different times during different phases), and does not have the opportunity to steal the bitcoins. If it tried replacing one of the destination addresses with its own, whoever got left out would notice and refuse to sign the transaction, causing the protocol to fail. The only possible failure mode simply results in the transaction not taking place. Furthermore, anyone can become a facilitator at essentially no startup cost; in fact, a completely decentralized setup might have one of the N people becoming the facilitator on the fly.

The mechanism also, perhaps unintentionally, accomplishes another objective: if widely used, it potentially defeats the utility of the “closure” concept. Closures rely on the idea that all inputs to a transaction are signed by the same person; here, the separate inputs to the mixing transaction are signed by complete strangers. Of course, the protocol as currently implemented can easily be accounted for – closure algorithms can deliberately avoid transactions with inputs of the same size. However, anonymizers themselves can fight back. Theoretically, one person can participate in the same mix multiple times, sending and receiving the bitcoins in different denominations (eg. sending in a single input of 0.03 BTC and getting three outputs of 0.01 BTC). From the other side, ordinary wallets can try to deliberately make their transactions look like anonymizing transactions; for example, a wallet provider might make their wallet always provide change in 0.01 BTC chunks, so every transaction will naturally appear to be a mix. There will be ways of detecting many of these things, but even still the closure’s status will drop from being a surefire way of discovering someone’s secret Bitcoin stash to just another heuristic tool.

How will regulators feel about this? If this mixer reaches a high level of popularity – for example, by being integrated into existing Bitcoin wallets, it will certainly make the effort to make Bitcoin traceable by regulating the exchanges more difficult. However, for those concerned about large corporations, dictatorships and multibillion dollar drug cartels, there is one saving grace: the more money you want to mix, the harder it will be. “While [a thief] might attempt to use a mix service to hide the source of the money,” the George Mason paper reads, “we again argue that these services do not currently have the volume to launder thousands of bitcoins.” If a billionaire tried to mix their funds with blockchain.info, the mix would become 99% them – making the mixer essentially useless for the billionaire. Furthermore, at sufficiently high volumes, transaction flows become much more distinguishable all on their own; there may be millions of people moving around 0.01 BTC, but there are only a few people with over 100,000 BTC, and the Bitcoin de-anonymization papers seen thus far have already had considerable success uncovering their stashes of bitcoins on the blockchain. In every case, the story is similar: more money, less privacy. Mixing $50 to hide your medical purchases from Target or your marijuana habit from the government, fine. $1.3 billion suddenly disappearing off the face of the earth? Bitcoin may well actually make that harder.

Bitcoin Volatility – The 4 perspectives

Bitcoin exchange rate volatility affects everybody who uses Bitcoin as a currency or trades it as an asset. Hoewever, the available material about Bitcoin volatility is limited. Therefore it’s time for some investigation. The results are somewhat counter-intuitive. That makes the whole topic even more worthwile.

1. What is Bitcoin volatility

For any traded currency or asset, volatility is a measure for the dispersion of value changes around the average change. Changes in value are usually looked at on a day to day basis.

Value changes are measured as relative or percentage changes. That’s because only relative changes are comparable between different assets and over time. To give an example: if the Bitcoin price goes from USD 100 to USD 101 per Bitcoin from one day to the other, that would be a +1% change. If the price went from USD 1,000 to USD 1,001 the absolute change is the same, but the relative change is only +0.1%. Looking at a time series of daily changes, we can calculate the average daily percentage change over this period. The average daily change of BTC vs USD on Mt.Gox between July 2010 and August 2013 was 0.7%. This figure is also called the mean or expected daily return on an asset. 0.7% average daily return is quite a lot compared to other assets.

Once we have the average daily change over a given period, we can calculate volatility. We do this to get a figure for the average dispersion around the mean. The higher this dispersion (i.e. the volatility), the more uncertainty is attached to the expected return of this asset. Bitcoins had a daily volatility of 7.2% over the mentioned period. We annualize this figure to get an idea of the possible dispersion over one year. The result is 136% annualized return volatility, which also is a lot.

So the Bitcoin volatility tells us how much the BTC vs USD exchange rate disperses around the mean over a given period. Let’s look at some more historical data to put the Bitcoin volatility into perspective.

2. Historical Bitcoin volatility

Thinking of historical Bitcoin volatility, it’s no big news that it was going through the roof. However, what does deserve attention is how it evolved. Since volatility is calculated as an arithmetic average, single observations have a high influence on the outcome. Therefore we need to put special emphasis on the most extreme moves. Had I asked “when did the most extreme Bitcoin price changes happen?”, what would you have answered? My personal guess would have been: spring 2013. Absolute changes in that time were massive. But looking at relative figures tells us, that’s not the whole story.

bitcoin daily returns 2010 to 2013
Data sources: bitcoincharts.com; own calculations

The chart shows us that the most dramatic Bitcoin price moves happened in 2011. In fact, 7 out of the 10 largest up moves occured in 2011, only one of them was in 2013. As we can see on the chart, it wasn’t the biggest one. Regarding downside moves the situation is similar. 6 out of the 10 largest downside moves happened in 2011. Only 2 of them occured in 2013. This does not say the ups and downs of spring 2013 were small, it just means that the basis for volatility, daily returns, were even more extreme in 2011.

When we talk about figures, they have more meaning if we relate them to other comparables. Only then it is possible to say whether something actually is “big, “small”, “extreme” etc. Therefore we need to take a step out of the Bitcoin ivory tower and have a look at the world outside of it. And we have to make sure we are comparing apples with apples.

Before we can compare Bitcoin to something else, we need to know what it is. From a volatility perspective, Bitcoin can be two things. First, Bitcoin is a currency and a form of money. Bitcoin satisfies the three criteria that are generally taken to define money. These are: a medium of exchange, a store of value and a unit of account. So when we think of Bitcoin as a currency, we need to compare it to other currencies.

The second way of looking at Bitcoin is to regard it as an asset. Assets represent value. As long as someone is willing to pay something in exchange for Bitcoin (be it other currencies, commodities, services etc.), Bitcoins are assets. Whether they are backed by anything or not, whether they have inherent utility (whatever that is) or not, doesn’t matter. Thus we can also compare Bitcoin to other assets. One obvious thing to do is to compare Bitcoins to other financial assets which are traded on liquid markets. Here prices adjust instantly to supply and demand and price data is publicly available.

bitcoin volatility vs euro and s&p500
Data sources: bitcoincharts.com; Yahoo! Finance; quandl.com; own calculations

The above chart shows the annualized 30 day moving average volatility of Bitcoin vs the US Dollar as traded on Mt.Gox. It is compared with the currency pair EURUSD and the S&P500 stock market index. There are two key messages following from this chart.

Comparing Bitcoin volatility with EURUSD we can see, that the EURUSD pair has a much smaller volatility. Only very rarely it crosses the 10% line. On the other hand, the S&P500 volatility is higher and fluctuates more. In 2011 it crosses the 40% line. Back in 2008, at the peak of the financial crisis, S&P500 volatility even went beyond 80% on an annualized basis. The Bitcoin volatility graph looks more like the S&P500 graph than like the EURUSD graph. Therefore, in the last three years Bitcoin prices behaved more like an asset than like a currency.

The other thing this chart shows us, is that the Bitcoin volatility has significant second order effects. At many points the volatility jumps from moderate values to values beyond 30%. So the change rate of volatility is high. This makes Bitcoin prices even more unpredictable. But looking at the development we also see, that these jumps tend occur less often. And more importantly, the Bitcoin volatility is declining. Slowly but steadily. Despite all the attention and the buzz, when it comes to Bitcoin volatility, the year 2013 so far has not been anything like 2011.

3. Friend or foe?

Now that we have looked at some facts, the question is how we judge them. Is high volatility helpful for Bitcoin or not. This depends on the perspective, from which you look at it. Volatility is also a synonym for risk. And risk usually has a connection to return. There is upside and downside potential. Some might like this, some might not.

Investors

People who invest in assets and derivatives on these assets calculate the risks of their investments. With high volatility, there is also a potential for big returns. Bitcoin has so far delivered outstanding returns. So for those investors who are risk-prone, high Bitcoin volatility is a gift. If investors are risk-averse, they can simply stay out of Bitcoin and invest in other assets. The upside potential outweighs the risk for this group.

Miners

I’m not a mining expert. But if I became a miner, I would want to have a somewhat reliable estimate about the expected return from my hardware investment. Such a calculation gets very difficult when Bitcoin volatility is high. For miners, a high Bitcoin volatility means more risk than opportunity. If prices are on a temporary decline, miners can’t wait forever for a recovery. Mining difficulty could get too high in the meantime.

Merchants

Shops and e-commerce businesses make a living from selling goods and services. They are fully occupied with improving their products and their marketing. Managing exchange rate fluctuations isn’t their field of expertise. It would be bad news for them if their profit margins deteriorated due to foreign exchange risk. And if you have someone managing FX, it costs you money. Merchants need a stable currency.

Average Joe users

People who use Bitcoin simply to pay with it or to transfer money from one place to the other are a comparable to merchants . They use Bitcoin as a means to an end. When you use Bitcoin to send your earned money back home, you wouldn’t like the fact that it lost much of its value before your family could convert Bitcoins to their local currency. Surely, they would be happy about a value appreciation. But probably not at the expense of a high risk that their savings might lose value.

For three of the mentioned groups, a high Bitcoin volatility is not desirable. Some might argue, that since Bitcoin is a deflationary currency, it is more likely that these people will profit from a rising Bitcoin value than suffer losses. This might be true in the long term. But if you want to use Bitcoin as a means of payment on a daily basis, you don’t have this long term perspective. You can get badly hurt from short term price swings. So for most of us, high Bitcoin volatility is a foe. And again, appreciation and volatility are not the same thing. If the price went up by 1% every day, then volatility would be 0%. Even though the Bitcoin value would skyrocket.

Therefore, one condition for Bitcoin to succeed as a widely-used currency is, that its exchange rate volatility keeps declining. And if Bitcoin succeeds as a currency, it will also succeed as an asset.

4. Bitcoin volatility outlook

This article so far has not treated the causes behind the Bitcoin volatility development. Large price swings are the result of either high volume selling or buying. The motivations behind trading activities are complex and only rarely obvious. News are usually one of many factors. But in this regard, if you understand the past, it doesn’t say too much about the future. Unless you can predict news bites.

One thing that definitely has a measurable impact on volatility is market volume and liquidity. The last chart of this article shows how many Bitcoins have been traded on Mt.Gox against the US Dollar as a share of total Bitcoins in circulation on a daily basis.

bitcoin usd trading volume vs total bitcoins in circulation
Data sources: blockchain.info; own calculations

As the chart shows, an amount that exceeds 1% of total Bitcoins in circulation is traded frequently just against the US Dollar and just on Mt.Gox. This excludes all other currencies Bitcoin is traded against and all other exchanges where Bitcoins are traded. So if we were to sum up the entire trading volume and related it to the amount of Bitcoins in circulation, the share should be significantly higher. And values above 1% are already quite high if you compare this to a stock for instance. But there is also a development visible. The amount of daily traded Bitcoins as a percentage of total Bitcoins is falling. For one thing, the peak days have diminished since mid 2012.

One factor for this fall could be increasing Bitcoin market capitalization. The more all Bitcoins are worth, the less one single trade impacts the market price (ceteris paribus). There is almost a circular reference. As long as Bitcoin volatility is high, new users are less likely to participate. But the more users there are, the easier it gets to convince new users because of a smaller volatility.

The three charts we have looked at unveil a tendency of declining Bitcoin volatility. If this is a real trend, I wish it was here to stay. I’m cautiously optimistic about it. With roughly USD 1.5 bn market capitalization Bitcoin is still on a low level. That’s less than the smallest S&P500 company (Intel for instance has a market cap of USD 110 bn) and about one third of the money supply of Uganda. Both, small cap stocks and currencies of small countries are known to be volatile. Exactly because of the impact single trades can have on market prices. My retained optimism comes from the growing Bitcoin user base. Users drive demand and demand increases market cap. In this chain of events volatility declines and Bitcoin can succeed.

Cointerra Planning to Release 2 Petahashes of Mining Power by December

The mining company Cointerra has announced its official launch today, offering what may be the most advanced Bitcoin mining hardware currently on the market. The company’s signature miner, the 2-TH/s TerraMiner IV, is seeing its price reduced from $15,750 to $14,000, or a mere $7 per GH/s – ten percent less than what appears to be its main competition, the Butterfly Labs Monarch at $7.8 GH/s. Large-scale and industrial buyers will also be interested in its batch chip sales, offering the 10 TerraHash package for $57,400 ($5.74 per GH/s) and the 25 TerraHash package for $139,750 ($5.59 per GH/s), although it is important to stress that these are chips and not full devices, and for small-scale buyers the company is planning on introducing more affordable models soon. All in all, the company aims to release 2 PH/s – two petahashes, or 2,000 terahashes, of mining power by December – over three times as much as the current power of the entire Bitcoin network combined.

Cointerra also offers several other guarantees that make it stand out among mining companies. According to the press release, Cointerra’s consumer protection programs include:

  • Our December delivery commitment: If we do not deliver your confirmed December delivery within 30 days of our promise, we will credit your account 20% of the hash power.
  • Customer Exchange. If you have a confirmed order and your circumstances change, we will help you find someone who would like to take your place in the queue for our products. While we cannot guarantee there is a buyer for your order and place in the queue, we will do our best to help you find a prospect to buy your position.
  • Price protection on any undelivered orders. If we lower the price of an existing december delivery TerraMiner mining rig or ASIC TeraHash Package, we will re-price all existing undelivered orders and offer either a cash refund or larger and more valuable Hash Power credit. This means all existing orders will be re-priced to the new pricing based upon order quantity.

These three guarantees were designed to allay customers’ fears that they would see a repeat of previous Bitcoin mining mishaps; the first two were motivated by the long delays of Butterfly Labs, which released their devices in April 2013 rather than October 2012 as was originally intended, and the last guarantee is a response to ASICMiner, which has reduced the prices on their Block Erupter USBs from an initial 1.99 BTC to a low of 0.175 BTC, making ASICMiner buyers who had made the purchase at the initial high price feel like they had been cheated of their money. One guarantee that Cointerra does not make, but another business does, is that of Hashfast; as their own page on the subject describes it:

If the Bitcoin network hashrate increases so that your Baby Jet doesn’t generate more Bitcoins in ninety days than you paid for it, HashFast will give you additional ASICs. In fact, we will give you up to 400% more hashing capacity than the Baby Jet you purchased. Yes, that does mean that if you don’t make your money back in 90 days, we will increase your mining capacity to up to 2 Terahashes!

Hashcash’s mining stats are also impressive, offering $11.2 per GH/s ($2.8 if the guarantee kicks in) and shipping by October. Unfortunately, however, their own mining rigs are currently sold out.

In general, sheer growth of the Bitcoin mining economy is highly impressive. Five months ago, ASICMiner chief friedcat was met with a large amount of disbelief when he claimed that the power of the Bitcoin network would increase to at least 1000 TH/s by the end of the year. Now, the network is at 600 TH/s already, and Cointerra’s claim of 2 PH/s by December appears downright uncontroversial by comparison. Two months ago, KnCMiner, with their $20 per GH/s devices planned for shipping in October was all the rage; today, even they have slipped into the background as Butterfly Labs’ Monarch and now the TerraMiner have taken center stage.

The security of the Bitcoin network is increasing rapidly as a result. Taking an estimate of 1 MH/s per CPU, the Bitcoin network’s current hashrate of 600 TH/s is now so powerful that a botnet seeking to overpower the Bitcoin network and mount a 51% attack would need to literally take over nearly every computer in the world to be effective. And once Cointerra’s two petahashes come in, the threat of botnet takeover will be outright impossible. From here, it’s simply a matter of increasing the cost of a successful attack. So far, most people trying to estimate this cost start out by trying to figure out how much money it would take to purchase the right amount of ASICs or develop a fabrication facility in house – however, this is a very difficult thing to do accurately. A more successful alternative strategy is to instead measure the “opportunity cost” – the potential profit of using the amount of mining power needed to pull off an attack honestly, which would be thrown away by using the power to attack Bitcoin instead. Resallex has an automatic calculator that does this; currently the price stands at $400 million, out of reach of the annual military budget of half of all governments in the world. Some of Resallex’s estimates are questionable; the 8% annual discounting rate on future returns, for example, is far too low given the inherent risk in the Bitcoin economy, and a more reasonable estimate of 20% would give Bitcoin a “takedown cost” of $150 million. In either case, however, the Bitcoin network is clearly becoming a force to be reckoned with.

BitMonet: BitPay’s Newest Merchant

Today, BitPay Inc. announced a new partnership with BitMonet. BitMonet’s partnership with BitPay will permit customers to monetize content with bitcoin micropayments.

BitMonet’s embrace of Bitcoin through BitPay alleviates excessively high interchange fees that make many micropayments impractical. As a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, Bitcoin paves the way for micropayments over the Internet. International payments are also more feasible. BitMonet provides publishers with a monetization tool for digital content.

BitMonet was started in 2013 by Ankur Nandwani and Valerie Chao and is free and easy to install, allowing publishers to sell individual content a-la-carte, or through time-metered access. Through BitMonet, publishers can bring in greater returns than traditional advertising. For example, even at a price point of 1 cent per content, a publisher can receive 10 dollars per 1,000 views. Services like BitMonet also provide a better reading experience as the focus is shifted from advertising to content.

Moving forward, publishers with a BitPay merchant account can now install the BitMonet script on their website and start collecting payments. As with all merchants, BitPay will permit publishers using BitMonet to decide whether to keep incoming bitcoins or exchange for a different currency.

 

Bitcoin Magazine had an opportunity to interview Ankur Nandwani of BitMonet.

Bitcoin Magazine: When did you first hear about Bitcoin?

Ankur Nandwani: I first heard about Bitcoin when a friend of mine asked for help in evaluating potential investment opportunities in Bitcoin companies. So in the process of preparing a report, I ended up learning a lot about the technology behind Bitcoin and the various companies in the space.

 

BM: What was it about Bitcoin that you found interesting?

AN: What I’ve found the most interesting is the financial system that is being built around Bitcoin. The same financial system that exists in more traditional currencies is developing around Bitcoin, only at a hyper-aggressive pace. Being able to witness the birth and growth of this financial system has been extremely interesting for me.

 

BM: When did you first get the idea for your services and what inspired you to create the site?

AN: I am an avid news reader. I spend 2-3 hours every day reading news from all over the world. Over the last few years, I’ve noticed that some of the websites I visit have started putting up paywalls. Often, when I want to read only one article, paying $20 for a subscription just doesn’t make sense. So I started doing research on how I could deal with this problem. This was around the time that I was researching Bitcoin investment opportunities, and it just clicked for me.

BM: Were there any pre-existing businesses that inspired you to create your services?  

AN: I developed the initial concept when I noticed a void in the market around ways for publishers to accept Bitcoin; most of the solutions out there were too generic, and did not focus on any specific vertical market. The ones that did exist were built around traditional payment methods, which made it difficult to monetize a single piece of content.

BM: Where do you see services going in a year?  

AN: Right now we are only focussing on the publisher vertical, so for the next few months we plan to optimize and improve our current offering for that specific type of user. We’re planning on developing plugins for a number of popular publishing platforms. Once we have a strong foothold, we plan to look into expanding into other areas like social gaming and mobile platforms like Android and iOS. As we have mentioned before, all these solutions will be offered for free, and incur no transactions fees.

BM: What makes your product stand out in comparison to other businesses utilizing Bitcoin?

AN: Compared to other products, BitMonet is much easier to use and gives a much larger opportunity for customization. By offering an easy way for publishers to customize BitMonet, the solution can fit the current branding of the product and whatever payment model the publisher desires, either a-la-carte, or through time-metered access.

 

BM: What are your suggestions for individuals hoping to start a business like yours?

AN: We’ve decided that instead of running BitMonet as a business, we’re going to use it to promote adoption of Bitcoin. That’s why we are making our library open source and available free for anyone to download and modify. Additionally, there are no transaction fees for using BitMonet. We’re hoping that others follow our lead so that Bitcoin can become more widespread.

BM: If I am a customer looking to use your services, how can I get started?

AN:Getting started with BitMonet is really easy; it takes about 10 minutes. We provide step-by-step instructions on how to integrate BitMonet into your existing website on our documentation page. We’re also happy to answer any technical questions that may come up, just contact us at contact@bitmonet.com. We find feedback really valuable and are always looking for ways to improve BitMonet.

 

Bitcoin Foundation Leadership to Meet with Regulators in Washington

Today, representatives from the Bitcoin Foundation are scheduled to meet with members of at least seven executive agencies in Washington. Regulators are attempting to understand where to begin with a digital currency that is not backed by a central government like traditional fiat currencies. The main concerns of regulators are to ensure that Bitcoin and other digital, decentralized currencies are not used for illegal activities such as drug purchases or money laundering. Patrick Murck along with additional representatives from the Bitcoin Foundation hope to alleviate concerns of regulators and answer any questions to be able to move forward in a safe regulatory environment.

 

The Wall Street Journal highlighted the desire for the Bitcoin Foundation and some Bitcoin companies to comply with certain laws. The Bitcoin Foundation and many members of the Bitcoin community would prefer transparency should regulations be put in place.  As Bitcoin is a growing cryptocurrency, the Bitcoin community needs an understanding of any existing regulations and plans for regulations.

 

The main purpose of today’s Washington, DC meetings will be for representatives from the Bitcoin Foundation to highlight how useful and applicable to businesses and individuals around the world Bitcoin has become. Yet, Bitcoin Foundation representatives will also stress that the US will not be able to benefit fully from Bitcoin should regulators crack down with excess regulations. Bitcoin startups will not be able to thrive and survive in the US should regulations be piled on without consideration of the impact on Bitcoin growth and development and the merits of Bitcoin.

 

With the Bitcoin economy at over $1.4 Billion, US regulators have the potential to learn more about Bitcoin prior to pressing for constricting regulations to permit the Bitcoin community to continue to flourish and also allow the US to truly benefit economically from the increased growth of Bitcoin in the US and around the world. Whereas the Bitcoin community as a whole would prefer limited interaction with government, the opportunity to educate on the merits of Bitcoin has arisen. One can only hope that after today’s meetings, regulators will have a better understanding of the currency and will be slow to act and implement onerous regulations.

 

What Proof of Stake Is And Why It Matters

If you have been involved in Bitcoin for any significant length of time, you have probably at least heard of the idea of “proof of work”. The basic concept behind proof of work is simple: one party (usually called the prover) presents the result of a computation which is known to be hard to compute, but easy to verify, and by verifying the solution anyone else can be sure that the prover performed a certain amount of computational work to generate the result. The first modern application, presented as “Hashcash” by Adam Back in 1996, uses a SHA256-based proof of work as an anti-spam measure – by requiring all emails to come with a strong proof-of-work attached, the system makes it uneconomical for spammers to send mass emails while still allowing individuals to send messages to each other when they need to. A similar system is used today for the same purpose in Bitmessage, and the algorithm has also been repurposed to serve as the core of Bitcoin’s security in the form of “mining”.

How does SHA256 Proof of Work Work?

SHA256 is what cryptographers call a “one-way function” – a function for which it is easy to calculate an output given an input, but it is impossible to do the reverse without trying every possible input until one works by random chance. The canonical representation of a SHA256 output is as a series of 64 hexadecimal digits – letters and numbers taken from the set 0123456789abcdef. For example, here are the first digits of a few hashes:

SHA256("hello") = 2cf24dba...
SHA256("Hello") = 185f8db3...
SHA256("Hello.") = 2d8bd7d9...

The output of SHA256 is designed to be highly chaotic; even the smallest change in the input completely scrambles the output, and this is part of what makes SHA256 a one-way function.
Finding an input whose SHA256 starts with ‘0’ on average takes 16 attempts, ’00’ takes 256 attempts, and so forth. The way Hashcash, and Bitcoin mining, work, is by requiring provers (ie. mail senders or miners) to find a “nonce” such that SHA256(message+nonce) starts with a large number of zeroes, and then send the valid nonce along with the message as the proof of work. For example, the hash of block 254291 is:

000000000000003cf55c8d254fc97d2850547e5b787a936bc729497d76443a89

On average, it would take 72057 trillion attempts to find a nonce that, when hashed together with a block, returns a value starting with this many zeroes (technically, 282394 trillion since the POW requirement is a bit more complex than “starts with this many zeroes”, but the general principle is the same). The reason this artificial difficulty exists is to prevent attackers from overpowering the Bitcoin network and introducing alternative blockchains that reverse previous transactions and block new transactions; any attacker trying to flood the Bitcoin network with their own fake blocks would need to make 282394 trillion SHA256 computations to produce each one.

However, there is a problem: proof of work is highly wasteful. Six hundred trillion SHA256 computations are being performed by the Bitcoin network every second, and ultimately these computations have no practical or scientific value; their only purpose is to solve proof of work problems that are deliberately made to be hard so that malicious attackers cannot easily pretend to be millions of nodes and overpower the network. Of course, this waste is not inherently evil; given no alternatives, the wastefulness of proof of work may well be a small price to pay for the reward of a decentralized and semi-anonymous global currency network that allows anyone to instantly send money to anyone else in the world for virtually no fee. And in 2009 proof of work was indeed the only option. Four years later, however, we have developed a number of alternatives.

Sunny King’s Primecoin is perhaps the most moderate, and yet at the same time potentially the most promising, solution. Rather than doing away with proof of work entirely, Primecoin seeks to make its proof of work useful. Rather than using SHA256 computations, Primecoin requires miners to look for long “Cunningham chains” of prime numbers – chains of values n-1, 2n-1, 4n-1, etc up to some length such that all of the values in the chain are prime (for the sake of accuracy, n+1, 2n+1, 4n+1 can also be a valid Cunningham chain, and Primecoin also accepts “bi-twin chains” of the form n-1, n+1, 2n-1, 2n+1… where all terms are prime). It is not immediately obvious how these chains are useful – Primecoin advocates have pointed to a few theoretical applications, but these all require only chains of length 3 which are trivial to produce. However, the stronger argument is that in modern Bitcoin mining the majority of the production cost of mining hardware is actually researching methods of mining more efficiently (ASICs, optimized circuits, etc) and not building or running the devices themselves, and in a Primecoin world this research would go towards finding more efficient ways of doing arithmetic and number theory computation instead – things which have applications far beyond just mining cryptocurrencies.

The reason why Primecoin-like “useful POWs” are the most promising is that, if the computations are useful enough, the currency’s “waste factor” can actually drop below zero, making the currency a public good. For example, suppose that there is a computation which, somehow, has a 1 in 1020 chance of getting researchers significantly further along the way to curing cancer. Right now, no individual or organization has much of an incentive to attempt it: if they get lucky and succeed, they could either release the secret and earn little personal benefit beyond some short-lived media recognition or they could try to sell it to a few researchers under a non-disclosure agreement, which would rob everyone not under the non-disclosure agreement of the benefits of the discovery and likely not earn too much money in any case. If this magic computation was integrated into a currency, however, the block reward would incentivize many people to perform the computation, and the results of the computations would be visible on the blockchain for everyone to see. The societal reward would be more than worth the electricity cost. However, so far we know of no magical cancer-curing computation; the closest is Folding@home, but it lacks mathematical verificability – a dishonest miner can easily cheat by making fake computations that are indistinguishable from real results to any proof of work checker but have no value to society. As far as mathematically verifiable useful POWs go, Primecoin is the best we have, and whether its societal benefit fully outweighs its production and electricity cost is hard to tell; many people doubt it. But even then, what Primecoin accomplished is very praiseworthy; even partially recovering the costs of mining as a public good is better than nothing.

Proof of Stake

However, there is one SHA256 alternative that is already here, and that essentially does away with the computational waste of proof of work entirely: proof of stake. Rather than requiring the prover to perform a certain amount of computational work, a proof of stake system requires the prover to show ownership of a certain amount of money. The reason why Satoshi could not have done this himself is simple: before 2009, there was no kind of digital property which could securely interact with cryptographic protocols. Paypal and online credit card payments have been around for over ten years, but those systems are centralized, so creating a proof of stake system around them would allow Paypal and credit card providers themselves to cheat it by generating fake transactions. IP addresses and domain names are partially decentralized, but there is no way to construct a proof of ownership of either that could be verified in the future. Indeed, the first digital property that could possibly work with an online proof of stake system is Bitcoin (and cryptocurrency in general) itself.

There have been several proposals on how proof of stake can be implemented; the only one that is currently working in practice, however, is PPCoin, once again created by Sunny King. PPCoin’s proof of stake algorithm works as follows. When creating a proof-of-stake block, a miner needs to construct a “coinstake” transaction, sending some money in their possession to themselves as well as a preset reward (like an interest rate, similar to Bitcoin’s 25 BTC block reward). A SHA256 hash is calculated based only on the transaction input, some additional fixed data, and the current time (as an integer representing the number of seconds since Jan 1, 1970). This hash is then checked against a proof of work requirement, much like Bitcoin, except the difficulty is inversely proportional to the “coin age” of the transaction input. Coin age is defined as the size of the transaction input, in PPcoins, multiplied by the time that the input has existed. Because the hash is based only on the time and static data, there is no way to make hashes quickly by doing more work; every second, each PPCoin transaction output has a certain chance of producing a valid work proportional to its age and how many PPCoins it contains, and that is that. Essentially, every PPCoin can act as a “simulated mining rig”, albeit with the interesting property that its mining power goes up linearly over time but resets to zero every time it finds a valid block.

It is not clear if using coin age as PPCoin does rather than just output size is strictly necessary; the original intent of doing so was to prevent miners from re-using their coins multiple times, but PPCoin’s current design does not actually allow miners to consciously try to generate a block with a specific transaction output. Rather, the system does the equivalent of picking a PPCoin at random every second and maybe giving its owner the right to create a block. Even without including age as a weighting factor in the randomness, this is roughly equivalent to a Bitcoin mining setup but without the waste. However, there is one more sophisticated argument in coin age’s favor: because your chance of success goes up the longer you fail to create a block, miners can expect to create blocks more regularly, reducing the incentive to dampen the risk by creating the equivalent of centralized mining pools.

Beyond Cryptocurrency

But what makes proof of stake truly interesting is the fact that it can be applied to much more than just currency. So far, anti-spam systems have fallen into three categories: proof of work, captchas and identity systems. Proof of work, used in systems like Hashcash and Bitmessage, we have already discussed extensively above. Captchas are used very widely on the internet; the idea is to present a problem that a human can easily solve but a computer can’t, thereby distinguishing the two (CAPTCHA stands for “Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart”). In practice, this usually involves presenting a messy image containing letters and numbers, and requiring the solver to type in what the letters and numbers are. Recent providers have implemented a “public good” component into the system by making part of the captcha a word from a printed book, using the power of the crowd to digitize old printed literature. Unfortunately, captchas are not that effective; recent machine-learning efforts have achieved success rates of 30-96% – similar to that of humans themselves. Identity systems come in two forms. First, there are systems that require users to register with their physical identity; this is how democracies have so far avoided being overrun by anonymous trolls. Second, there are systems that require some fee to get into, and moderators can close accounts without refund if they are found to be trying to abuse the system. These systems work, but at the cost of privacy.

Proof of stake can be used to provide a fourth category of anti-spam measure. Imagine that, instead of filling in a captcha to create a forum account, a user can consume coin age by sending a Bitcoin or PPCoin transaction to themselves instead. To make sure each proof of stake computation is done by the user, and not simply randomly pulled from the blockchain, the system might require the user to also send a signed message with the same address, or perhaps send their money back to themselves in a specific way (eg. one of the outputs must contain exactly 0.000XXXXX BTC, with the value randomly set each time). Note that here coin age is crucial; we want users to be able to create proofs of stake on demand, so something must be consumed to prevent reuse. In a way, a form of proof of stake already exists in the form of SMS verification, requiring users to send text messages to prove ownership of a phone to create a Google account – although this is hardly pure proof of stake, as phone numbers are also heavily tied with physical identity and the process of buying a phone is itself a kind of captcha. Thus, SMS verification has some of the advantages and some of the disadvantages of all three systems.

But proof of stake’s real advantage is in decentralized systems like Bitmessage. Currently, Bitmessage uses proof of work because it has no other choice; there is no “decentralized captcha” solution out there, and there has been little research into figuring out how to make one. However, proof of work is wasteful, and makes Bitmessage a somewhat cumbersome and power-consuming system to use – for emails, it’s fine, but for instant messaging forget about it. But if Bitmessage could be integrated into Bitcoin (or Primecoin or PPCoin) and use it as proof of stake, much of the difficulty and waste could be alleviated.

Does proof of stake have a future? Many signs suggest that it certainly does. PPCoin founder Sunny King argues that Bitcoin’s security will become too weak over time as its block reward continues to drop; indeed, this is one of his primary motivations for creating PPCoin and Primecoin. Since then, PPCoin has come to be the fifth largest cryptocurrency on the market, and an increasing number of new cryptocurrencies are copying its proof-of-stake design. Currently, PPCoin is not fully proof-of-stake; because it is a small cryptocurrency with a highly centralized community, the risk of some kind of takeover is higher than with Bitcoin, so a centralized checkpointing system does exist, allowing developers to create “checkpoints” that are guaranteed to remain part of the transaction history forever regardless of what any attacker does. Eventually, the intent is to both move toward making the checkpointing system more decentralized and reducing its power and PPCoins come to be owned by a larger group of people. An alternative approach might be to integrate proof of stake as a decentralized checkpointing system into Bitcoin itself; for example, one protocol might allow any coalition of people with at least 1 million BTC-years to consume their outputs to generate a checkpoint that the community would agree is a valid block, at the cost of sending their coins to themselves and consuming coin age.

In 2009, cryptocurrency emerged as the culmination of a number of unrelated cryptographic primitives: hash functions, Merkle trees, proof of work and public key cryptography all play key roles in Bitcoin’s construction. Now, however, Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are here to stay, and this presents another exciting possibility for the future of cryptography: we can now design protocols that build off of cryptocurrency itself – of which proof of stake is the perfect example. Proof of stake can be used to secure a cryptocurrency, it can be used in decentralized anti-spam systems, and probably in dozens of other protocols that we haven’t even thought of yet – just like no one had thought of anything like Bitcoin until Wei Dai’s b-money in 1998. The possibilities are endless.

Bitcoin in Berlin

Over the past two years, Berlin has gained a reputation as one of the Bitcoin capitals of the world. Around the city, there are nearly two dozen restaurants and shops accepting the currency, including six concentrated in a single block. Room77, the restaurant that started it all, holds Bitcoin meetups on the first Thursday of every month, and dozens of people attend. The most recent meetup on August 1 saw unusually high attendance, with a number of prominent Bitcoin activists from Europe and around the world attending; stateless political activist Mike Gogulski, Defense Disributed‘s Cody Wilson, Bitcoin developer Amir Taaki, bitcoin.de operator Oliver Flaskamper and Mihai Alisie and myself from Bitcoin Magazine were all present.

The story started with Room77, a restaurant specializing in burgers located in the heart of Kreuzberg, a district of Berlin known for its left-anarchist history. The restaurant’s owner, Joerg Platzer, first started accepting Bitcoin in 2011, just before the peak of the first bubble in June. Several news sources in the local media reported on the event, showing customers paying around 0.5 BTC for a burger. Like all other Bitcoin-related businesses, Room77 faded somewhat in prominence as the 2011 bubble collapsed, but the restaurant kept going, and at the end of 2012 Platzer started the Bitcoin Kiez, a campaign to expand Bitcoin’s presence in the city to beyond just the one restaurant. In November, Platzer announced two new businesses accepting Bitcoin, by December the figure was up to six, and now, after seven months of continued expansion in 2013, the total count on the semi-official bitcoinkiez.de map stands at 17.

It is important to point out that the picture of the Bitcoin Kiez in Berlin is not quite so rosy as some of its more fervent enthusiasts claim. The media hype around the area can easily lead one to have the impression that the neighborhood around Room77 is plastered with Bitcoin-accepting businesses almost one after the other, and Bitcoin is “as easy to use as cash“. In reality, however, even in the heart of the Kiez around Room77 one needs to look hard to find the other Bitcoin businesses around. Having nine businesses all within several hundred meters of each other may seem like a lot on paper, but given that there are several hundred fiat-only businesses within three hundred meters of Room77, it ends up appearing somewhat underwhelming when one actually goes there. The other nine Bitcoin-accepting locations in Berlin are scattered around the city; you need to make a specific effort to find and go to each one. That said, however, the success of the Bitcoin Kiez in Berlin should not be understated; there is no other city in the world with even ten Bitcoin-accepting locations, with second place perhaps going to San Francisco with around five. Berlin is thus pretty much the only city in the world where one can live entirely on Bitcoin without relying on an established support network, and enjoy the experience. The city has restaurants accepting Bitcoin, a tour guide, places to live through either 9flats or unterkunft.de and a thriving Bitcoin and hacker scene. And things are only going to get better.

For a more detailed look at Bitcoin in Berlin, be sure to look out for the upcoming issue 13 of our magazine. Additionally, Solene and Lorenza from the European Bitcoin community have provided a large number of pictures from the Bitcoin meetups:

https://plus.google.com/photos/115742856189848313825/albums/5915281564744665713?authkey=CIXYgrzfnful-wE
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/w7f5ee2i6tymyf4/hlrQxoUgbQ#/

The United States’ Regulatory Shame

Over the past year, we have seen over a dozen countries’ governments weigh in on Bitcoin in some fashion. Australia, and the Netherlands simply said that Bitcoin is taxable, India states that it has no intent to regulate Bitcoin exchanges under local money transmission law, Canada and Great Britain did both, Norway and Sweden warned against it but did little else, Finland simply said that Bitcoin is legal, and France and China gave it their tacit approval, and Thailand took the opposite track, suggesting (but certainly not conclusively ruling) that it might be illegal outright. Finally, in the United States, the response has been truly massive. Over the last twelve months, the country has seen a combination of pretty much every regulatory opinion on Bitcoin that could be made, with at least ten separate state and federal government agencies weighing in in some fashion. The list is growing almost every week, but here are the current top ten:

  1. The New Hampshire Deputy Secretary of State formally approved New Hampshire State Representative Mark Warden’s acceptance of bitcoins for political contributions.
  2. The New Hampshire Securities Bureau stated that they do not intend to regulate Bitcoin for the time being, as “it is not money and therefore it does not meet the investment contract analysis.”
  3. A judge in Texas denied Trendon Shavers’ defense that the Securities and Exchange Commission has no authority to investigate his Ponzi scheme because “Bitcoin is not money”, claiming that Bitcoin certainly is money.
  4. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued a guidance report in March 2013 explaining the regulatory status of Bitcoin exchanges. This guidance established that ordinary Bitcoin businesses are not affected by money transmission law, but exchanges are, and so require federal and state money transmitter licenses along with the requisite $7 million in surety bonds (costing about $100,000 per year). FinCEN officials have proceeded to make multiple comments on Bitcoin since then.
  5. California’s Department of Financial Institutions sent a cease and desist letter to the Bitcoin Foundation, telling it to “cease and desist from the business of conducting money transmission in this state” but explaining little else. The Bitcoin Foundation has since replied.
  6. The House of Representatives released an appropriations bill detailing the budgets of various government agencies. The bill included a “rider” (a general term) for a provision hidden inside a bill with little relation to the content of the rest of the bill) asking the FBI “to provide a briefing no later 120 days after the enactment of this Act on the nature and scale of the risk posed by such ersatz currency, both in financing illegal enterprises and in undermining financial institutions.”
  7. A Senate committee instructed the Department of Homeland Security to provide “any policies, procedures, guidance or advisories related to the treatment or regulation of virtual currencies”, citing concerns that “[Bitcoin’s] near-anonymous and decentralized nature has also attracted criminals who value few things more than being allowed to operate in the shadows”.
  8. Bitcoin exchange MtGox saw its US bank account frozen by the Department of Homeland Security, which argued that, when processing deposits and withdrawals, MtGox was moving USD between Dwolla accounts and its own MtGox accounts, and this constituted unlicensed money transmission. Note that, contrary to popular opinion, Bitcoin was not strictly involved here.
  9. The Government Accountability Office published a report describing under what circumstances virtual currency transactions are taxable, and recommends the IRS to help educate taxpayers about virtual currency taxation. However, the report writes, “Given [the] uncertainty, available funding, and other priorities, IRS made a reasoned decision not to implement a compliance approach specific to virtual economies and currencies.”
  10. New York’s Department of Financial Services subpoenaed 22 Bitcoin businesses, in an attempt to gather information on Bitcoin business and see if the DFS should create new relations specifically tailored to the Bitcoin economy.

Much of the attention on Bitcoin has simply been inquisitive, trying to figure out what dangers Bitcoin poses with regard to crime and money laundering. In general, however, the attention on Bitcoin is much more hostile in the United States than elsewhere, not only in terms of the laws that have been passed but also in lawmakers’ rhetoric, actively creating an utterly unnecessary state of fear in the Bitcoin world. This ranges from the FinCEN paper’s comments that irreversible payments are the territory of criminals, the FBI and Senate committe’s focus on Bitcoin’s potential to promote crime, and the CFTC’s almost threatening words that the agency “could regulate Bitcoin if we wanted”. In Europe, Norway and Sweden have warned against Bitcoin, citing consumer protection and crime concerns, but every other government that has weighed in on Bitcoin has, by and large, simply stated that it is legal. The one exception is arguably Germany. In Germany, we have seen three regulatory moves on Bitcoin:

  1. In December 2011, German financial regulator BaFin wrote a report stating that they do not consider Bitcoin to be “electronic money”, treating it as a “unit of value” and in some cases a “unit of account”. As Stefan Greiner described it, “[BaFin’s wording] states that the “creation” of bitcoins and their “use as medium of payment” do not need a permit (license). However, regulation applicable to banks and financial services could be applicable to Bitcoin transactions under two conditions: (1) the bitcoins themselves become an “object of trade” and (2) the “structure of the transaction” justifies doing so. If these two criteria are met, bitcoins become “units of account” and therefore “by implication” financial instruments.”
  2. In June 2013, German FDP party member Frank Schäffler made a parliamentary inquiry asking the government for an opinion on Bitcoin’s tax status. The response: if the time between when bitcoins are bought and sold is longer than one year, then the owner does not need to pay capital gains tax on any earnings from Bitcoin rising in price during that period. However, the reply did not touch upon the subject of sales tax.
  3. Another inquiry by Frank Schäffler brings further clarity to Bitcoin regulation in Germany: Bitcoin is now private money. As a result of this, the act of selling bitcoins is taxable, but only if the sale is part of a business transaction. The requirements for a Bitcoin sale to count as a business transaction “are extremely high”; the key criterion is that one must be trading bitcoins not just for oneself, but also for other people. Additionally, new requirements for Bitcoin trading businesses come into play; among the most onerous are the requirement to have 730,000 EUR in initial capital and “professionally qualified management”

The last rule is tough, and certainly Bitcoin businesses would find Great Britain’s stance that Bitcoin exchanges will fall under no special regulation vastly preferable. However, even here, we see only three regulatory moves toward Bitcoin (or four if one counts the European Central Bank report from 2012) compared to the United States’ ten. Furthermore, every single action that the government took was toward further clarifying Bitcoin’s status and explaining what the rules are; there have been no one-off cease and desist letters or politicians inculcating a state of regulatory fear. Of course, Germany is much smaller than the United States, and its government less complex; in fact, many would argue that the appropriate comparison is not between the US and Germany, but between the US and the European Union – and in the EU, there have been even more than ten regulatory actions on Bitcoin so far. However, the European Union does not require businesses to get money transmitter licenses in all 27 member states – German businesses worry about German regulations, UK businesses worry about UK regulations, and the same for every other country. In the United States, every business must worry about every state’s regulations, in addition to half a dozen redundant regulatory agencies on the federal level.

What all of this says is that the quality of US regulatory agencies is poor, and that we can do better. Regulatory interaction in the US should not simply be limited to accepting existing laws and being in “compliance” with them, or even acting defensively to prevent further regulations in the years to come. Additionally, the United States can benefit greatly from a concerted political effort to attack the regulatory maze head on, and help improve the situation not just for Bitcoin, but for the digital payments industry as a whole. One model initiative in this regard is a Bitcoin primer for policymakers released by George Mason University, and another example is the Bitcoin Foundation’s two excellent letters to California’s Department of Financial Institutions and FinCEN. Yes, the US government is scary, and if the Bitcoin community plays its cards wrong much stricter regulations may be soon to come. However, the Bitcoin community must also not be excessively meek. A widely understood concept in political discourse is the Overton Window – the idea that there is always an “accepted” range of political discourse, and most people are naturally driven to compromise and find positions in the middle of the window. Thus, the role of extremists is to widen the window in one direction, so as to ultimately push the center. The Bitcoin community needs to be proactive, and start framing the discussion and setting the Overton window in favorable terms; the battle should be over the absurdity of requiring forty seven licenses to start a business, not over whether Bitcoin should be legal or not.

By targeting this aspect of regulation, the Bitcoin community can get plenty of business interests on its side, as money transmitter law is not the only kind of law that operates in this way. Self-regulatory organizations like DATA are another excellent idea, also because they allow the Bitcoin Foundation a way to step out of the role of being a regulatory compliance group to representing all sides of the Bitcoin community – including those who would prefer not to deal with regulators at all. Now is the right time to take this stance. Edward Snowden’s revelations have started to create a sea change in Americans’ opinion on the importance of safety and surveillance versus freedom and privacy, making increased restrictionism considerably easier to fight against. The quicker Bitcoin can be accepted as just another part of the internet, and not something new and scary, the better; hopefully, in time the idea of requiring forty seven licenses and millions of dollars in surety bonds will appear to everyone as absurd as the idea of regulating torrent networks seems to us today.

BTCTrip: Travel the World with Global Currency

In the past year, travel has become a mainstay of the Bitcoin economy. There are currently dozens of hostels and hotels accepting Bitcoin around the world, even including a hostel in the middle of the Guatemalan rainforest. For those who do not like hotels, Airbnb alternative 9flats, a service that allows homeowners to easily rent out their rooms to short-term travellers, has been accepting bitcoins since April. Bitcoin ATMs let people buy bitcoins in person whenever they need, and bi-directional ATMs will soon allow people to travel the world with nothing but Bitcoin and cash out into whatever local currency they need upon arrival. An increasingly large number of Bitcoin conferences provide a reason for people to travel and come together from around the country – or even around the world. All that was left is a way of buying plane tickets for bitcoins. Now, Martin Fernandez has come up with : BTCTrip.

Fernandez is, in many ways, the archetypal Bitcoin user. He had met original Linux developer Linus Torvalds and PGP creator Phil Zimmermann in the 1990s, and distinctly remembers Torvalds giving him a CD containing the first version of Slackware Linux in a meetup in 1998. “I was deep into this culture that all information had to be free,” Fernandez relates. He then proceeded to take up IT security as a career in 2004, and prospered for several years – until the 2007 economic crash hit. “It destroyed me completely,” Fernandez recalls. “I had to close my offices. I left the business scene for a couple of years completely, and I started to go into movies and use technology for the performing arts. [Several years later] I started teaching in Buenos Aires and working with technology again, and I was waiting for the one event that would drive me to come back. Then, I heard about Bitcoin and cryptocurrency.”

Excited about the project’s potential, Fernandez sent out emails to Phil Zimmermann and his other friends from the security community, and the responses he got were overwhelmingly positive. From there, Fernandez’s new career was set. All that was left was to figure out what it was that he could actually do for the Bitcoin community. Fernandez continues: “I called a designer friend, who is a crazy girl and makes flyers for electronics, and I said to her: Cassandra, design me a website for tickets, but we don’t want to just sell tickets, we want to sell the experience. Think of a programmer in Silicon Valley who just wants to take a break.” And so BTCTrip was born. The idea caught on quickly, with BitInstant founder Charlie Shrem becoming one of its earliest and loudest supporters, and many prominent Bitcoin users, including a number of Bitcoin Foundation members, quickly became BTCTrip customers.

BTCTrip functions similarly to other plane ticket selling intermediaries, like Skyscanner and Expedia. Users enter the city they want to fly from and fly to, their desired departure date (and arrival date for return trips) and optionally their tolerance for discomforts like stopovers and long flights, and BTCTrip scans through all major providers to figure out what the cheapest options are. The user then selects one of the routes, and is directed to a form where they can fill in their name, date of birth and email address, and then pay for the order with bitcoins. Once BTCTrip processes the order, the user receives the flight confirmation by email, and can either check in online at the company’s website or wait to check in at the airport.

Where BTCTrip truly shines, however, is in its prices. Most intermediary services that allow users to purchase products from the fiat currency economy with bitcoins by proxy work by charging a small percentage fee, so the services are actually more expensive than simply paying with one’s credit card directly. For this reason, most such services so far have seen little volume; their main customers are those whose primary income is in bitcoins, and so for whom it is converting from Bitcoin to fiat currency, rather than the other way around, that is the primary difficulty. BTCTrip, on the other hand, is often actually cheaper than its competition, charging buyers up to 5-10% less than what the ticket costs with a credit card. Most of the time intermediaries do this, it is either a marketing gimmick to attract more customers or a charity effort to support the Bitcoin community; not so with BTCTrip. Although Fernandez is unwilling to reveal the details of how his service does this, BTCTrip uses the bitcoins it receives from customers to provide liquidity for some kind of multi-currency arbitrage, exploiting inefficiencies in various Bitcoin and fiat currency exchange markets to earn a profit. “We are breaking even now,” Fernandez reports.

In practice, not all flights are cheaper on BTCTrip; sometimes, Skyscanner and Expedia provide significantly better options, and in one deliberately pathological test case of flying from Iqaluit, Canada to Auckland, New Zealand, BTCTrip’s offer of 8,200 USD was roughly triple the 1,970 EUR (2,630 USD) given by Expedia – although, in that particular case, switching the departure date from Aug 24 to Aug 25 brought BTCTrip’s offer down to $2,470 compared to Expedia’s $2,640. However, for those cases where BTCTrip’s search engine simply can’t win, there is still a way out: at the top of the results window, the site features a banner making a offer popular with discount vendors: “Found it cheaper somewhere? We can beat any offer.” And it’s true; you need only click the “Buy Now” button, and fill in a form containing their name, email and a link to the better offer, and within hours BTCTrip will send you an email offering the better deal – with a 5% discount applied. BTCTrip’s customer service is excellent, politely, professionally and, perhaps most importantly, quickly responding to travellers’ concerns or special needs.

Looking Further

Ultimately, BTCTrip’s mission extends far beyond simply offering flights for bitcoins; for Fernandez, the project is fundamentally about the community. The company does not purchase any advertising, relying entirely on word of mouth to get new customers, and places a heavy emphasis on public relations initiatives to support this strategy. BTCTrip has offered free tickets for Edward Snowden to use in Russia, and for free software advocate Richard Stallman to use in international travels. To support Bitcoin itself, Fernandez is actively trying to get Bitcoin accepted in Cuba, and BTCTrip frequently sells bitcoins to the Argentinian community, where most of the service’s employees are based. “These kinds of things are important to us,” Fernandez says. “Our business is based on community and trust in the community”

The two core pillars of BTCTrip – selling not flights but experience, and integrating with the community, will continue to serve as the basis of the company as it expands. Recently, BTCTrip announced that it intends to launch three new services: Rent a Car and Hotel (self-explanatory), BTCTrip Miles and Points, a rewards program for regular customers, and BTCTrip Surfing, a program targeted toward travelers attending international events like concerts, raves, social forums, hacker and tech conferences and, of course, Bitcoin events. After that, Fernandez has another service in mind: Couchsurfing for Bitcoin users. Couchsurfing is a site where travellers can find local people to stay with for the duration of their journeys, avoiding the need to pay for expensive hotels. The two most popular alternatives, Airbnb and 9Flats are hybrids between Couchsurfing and traditional rental, allowing hosts to collect a daily or monthly fee, and 9Flats has accepted bitcoins since April. An equivalent that was Bitcoin-only would work specifically to bring together Bitcoin users, giving visitors not just a place to stay but also at least one person with a common interest to talk about. Between Bitcoin flights, Bitcoin hotels and couchsurfing, and an increasing number of local Bitcoin restaurants, the nomad Bitcoiner has everything that they need to survive – although more Bitcoin grocery stores would certainly help cut down food costs from eating at restaurants three times a day.

Finally, BTCTrip might be planning a Bitcoin event of their own, to take place in Argentina. Argentina has seen a large growth in its local Bitcoin community because of the local government’s frequent economic mismanagement; the country last went bankrupt in 2001, and is currently experiencing inflation rates of around 30-50%, depending on which exchange rate one believes. “Argentinians know very well about the problems of banks,” Fernandez explains, “and they don’t trust banks, even American banks.” Capital controls, high taxes, and a government that often wastes the tax money that it receives provider a further impetus for Bitcoin adoption. Finally, Fernandez explains, “Argentinians like new social and economic movements” in general. And the Argentinian Bitcoin economy is more than just talk; on Mercado Libre, a South America-focused equivalent of Craigslist, many people publish products and services for sale for bitcoins, and a significant number of Bitcoin trades actually take place. “I think interest in Bitcoin will increase and increase here,” Fernandez believes.

Watch out for more updates from BTCTrip about the potential conference and their upcoming services in the months to come.

Bitcoin and China: More than Meets the Eye?

This article is not the first time that I have covered the Chinese Bitcoin economy. Four months ago, China saw its first major interaction with the Bitcoin community when the One Foundation, the largest independent charity in China, started accepting Bitcoin donations for a disaster relief campaign, and received 230 BTC (then $30,000) within two days. Two weeks after that, China became the first country to overtake the US in BitcoinQt client downloads, and keeps a position of second place to this day. China also has an online discount store accepting bitcoins, a high level of Bitcoin activity on Taobao, the local equivalent of Ebay, and a large number of users eager to take up Bitcoin having already gone through the virtual currency experience with Q Coin in 2007. Most interestingly of all, however, was a half-hour broadcast on China Central television, a station described by Wikipedia as the “predominant state television broadcaster in mainland China”. Since then, the Chinese government has made no moves whatsoever with regard to Bitcoin. At first, the likely explanation of this was simple: the Chinese Communist Party is a complex beast, and the culture and entertainment-focused parts of it can easily have an attitude of curiosity and even excitement about Bitcoin while the more conservative, state security-focused parts of the party simply haven’t woken up yet. However, with every passing month that the Chinese government simply sits around and does nothing, even while the central bank of Thailand, a longtime political ally of China, recommends that Bitcoin be banned, that hypothesis gets slightly less likely, and an alternative possibility comes into play: Bitcoin might be becoming China’s newest special economic zone.

China’s special economic zone (SEZ) program was first created in the early 1980s as part of China’s economic modernization initiative, creating specific locations with business-friendly policies in order to attract foreign investment, as well as experiment with different ways of increasing economic freedom so as to determine which policies would be best to expand to China as a whole. By focusing foreign investment into a few parts of the country, the scheme also satisfies the more conservative members of the Chinese government, allowing China to benefit from large quantities of foreign investment and expertise while still keeping the bulk of the population under the firm grip of authoritarian rule. This balancing act – being free, and advertising its freedom, in ways that are useful to the government without actually being free in general, has been a core part of Chinese government policy for the past three decades, and many of the government’s various initiatives, ranging from the Democracy Wall to the Hundred Flowers campaign in the late 1950s to the special economic zones themselves, can be viewed as being facets of it.

Now, the question is, how does Bitcoin fit into this picture? First of all, just like a special economic zone, the Bitcoin economy is currently small and highly self-contained. The total value of all bitcoins in circulation currently stands at about $1.1 billion, making the Bitcoin economy of the entire world smaller than many cities. Many Bitcoin spenders are also Bitcoin earners, partially because of the community aspect and partially because decoupling from the fiat economy for many hops at a time is often the only way that the cost savings of Bitcoin can be truly realized. Bitcoin users are also a self-selecting, and highly technically skilled, audience, and understand the risks of dealing with untested markets and technologies better than the average person. Thus, for China, encouraging the growth of Bitcoin business is an opportunity to tread the waters with increased economic freedom without compromising its social and economic regulatory structure as a whole. If Bitcoin gets too big, the Chinese government can always strike it down in one fell swoop with a government edict, much like it did with the Democracy Wall and Tiananmen Square.

Second, Bitcoin has the potential to become a cause célèbre of the civil liberties front. When the US government ordered DEFCAD to take down the files for their 3D printed gun three months ago, the internet community was up in arms, seeing the link between DEFCAD’s right to tell people how to make 3D printed weapons with the general ideal of freedom of information. Given the right public relations spin, US governmental persecution of Bitcoin can easily be made to elicit the same response. More recently, Edward Snowden’s revelations regarding the National Security Agency’s surveillance activities have become a source of ammunition for the Chinese government itself; two months ago the overseas edition of the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper, strongly rebuked the US government for its actions, saying that “in a sense, the United States has gone from a ‘model of human rights’ to ‘an eavesdropper on personal privacy’, the ‘manipulator’ of the centralised power over the international internet, and the mad ‘invader’ of other countries’ networks”, and the Global Times, owned by the People’s Daily, praised Edward Snowden as “a young idealist who has exposed the sinister scandals of the US government”. Of course, this is by every means a case of “the pot calling the kettle black”; less than two months later the People’s Daily called for “restraint in online speech“, and in general censorship and surveillance in China remains rampant. However, anything that allows the Chinese government to honestly say “we’re better than the United States”, no matter how small, represents an opportunity to frame the debate in China’s favor and improve the country’s highly authoritarian reputation.

Third, China has an established, and government-supported, culture of establishing local alternatives to foreign businesses. Replacing Ebay, China has Taobao, replacing Paypal there is Alipay, replacing Google there is Baidu, and taking Google’s role of the “main internet corporation” is Tencent. The main reason for doing this is national security; by having key internet infrastructure locally controlled, the Chinese Communist Party gains increased control over its citizens’ online interaction and, perhaps more importantly, strongly limits the control of the United States. With the revelations around Edward Snowden, this argument just got a whole lot more powerful. However, just because the Chinese government wants technological independence, that does not mean that it is guaranteed to succeed. In the international sphere credit cards and Paypal are much more powerful and, lacking government intervention or fundamentally new alternatives, may well come to take over the rest of the world – leaving China the choice of either submitting to the US financial sector or subjecting its citizens to economic isolation. This is a situation that the Chinese government is desperate to avoid in general; notice its repeated efforts to trade with other countries without the US dollar. Arguably, Bitcoin is precisely the fundamentally new alternative that China needs; because it is politically neutral and international, it would be much easier to get India, Africa and the Middle East onboard, and China can still choose to eventually exercise a high degree of control over local Bitcoin exchanges once they are in place if it feels the need to increase regulation. At this point, the chance that Bitcoin will become anything like that remains slim. But, as part of a shotgun strategy of trying many things and seeing what works, supporting Bitcoin can be a very solid bet.

We know that the Chinese government certainly can heed the above arguments and continue to be a Bitcoin-friendly regime. The question is, will it? So far, there is still almost no evidence that the Chinese government actually intends to be lax on Bitcoin in the future, or that any high-level officials actually have any of the above ideas in mind. However, there are reasons to be optimistic. The Economist described China’s new cadre of economic officials selected in 2013 as “encouragingly long on reformers and short on ideologues”, suggesting the possibility of a further sea change in the Communist Party’s economic policies. As far as civil liberties go, China is still far from catching up to the Western world (and the Western world is, despite the NSA, still quite far from catching down to China), but on the economic front the situation is quite positive. In the past, China was able to attract business with low wages, but in the last ten years Chinese wages have been rising over 10% year over year, and the “copycat economy” of delivering low-cost functional lookalikes of Western-made products is nearing its limits. If the Chinese government intends to steer the country toward being an effective post-industrial economy, then offering increased economic freedom and, particularly importantly, a pro-innovation environment, is the way to go. Perhaps there is indeed an “avant garde” in the Chinese government, which sees Bitcoin as a place to make one of its first moves. Or, perhaps, China’s Bitcoin-friendliness is still simply the result of government blindness, and a crackdown is due to come in two or four months. We don’t know. But with every passing week the alternative hypothesis is becoming increasingly likely; perhaps China’s Bitcoin acceptance has more behind it than meets the eye.

Germany Sets Standard for Bitcoin Regulation

All over the news in Germany last weekend was a reply by the German Ministry of Finance to an inquiry in parliament. The Ministry announces that Bitcoins are officially recognized. Some weeks ago already the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) amended a guidance to the definition of “financial instruments“ in the German Banking Code and stated that Bitcoins are financial instruments. Through this official recognition and definition of Bitcoins Germany has become the first country in the world that sets clear-cut rules for Bitcoins.

However, there are some drawbacks: Bitcoin companies must meet strict standards as they are now in principle regarded as financial service companies which must be licensed and will be supervised by BaFin. Inter alia the following conditions must be met:

  • Initial capital of 730.000 Euros
  • Management must be professionally qualified
  • A detailed business plan must be submitted
  • Capital adequacy standards must be met
  • AML mechanisms must be implemented
  • Reports must be submitted to BaFin regularly

With regard to the first criterion and including all other necessary expenses start-up costs should be somewhere near 1 million Euros. Yearly operating costs would also be fairly high.

On the other hand, however, Germany‘s clear-cut rules should facilitate access of Bitcoin companies to venture capital as VC companies now deal with a manageable regulatory environment. Especially Berlin is full of innovative start-ups and also has huge pools of venture capital.

In addition, cooperation with banks should be more easily conceivable as banks can now place Bitcoin companies in the regulatory framework and know what standards they must fulfill.

Other digital currencies (e.g. Ripples, Litecoins etc.) are also classified as financial instruments.

Operating without the necessary license is punishable as a criminal offense. Having a license permits doing business in other countries of the European Economic Area (the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) through the European financial passport scheme although it is not quite clear how this will work as long as other European countries have not classified Bitcoins.

BaFin may grant exemptions from some of the above mentioned rules. It appears overly zealous to apply rules which are tailored to the “traditional“ finance industry with a daily turnover in the trillions to a budding industry with a total global market capitalization of about one billion. This would probably need to be addressed on a political level though. The Merkel government has recently indicated that it is willing to support start-up companies in areas of technological innovation.

In addition, “financial instruments“ is an extremely broad term which comprises shares as well as credit default swaps and therefore may justify further adaptations based on the specific features inherent to a particular financial instrument.

Through this move the global discussion has become more complicated. Germany straightforwardly says Bitcoins are financial instruments, in the United States FinCEN says they are a “virtual currency“, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission says they are a “commodity”, and a judge in Texas has no doubts they are simply “money“, and in Thailand the central bank says they don‘t know what it is and therefore it‘s illegal. Time for regulators to come together and reach consensus.

Despite these open questions Germany has taken a huge and bold step. It will be very exciting to see how other financial centres like London, Switzerland, Singapore and the US now position themselves.

Bitcoin Exchange Berlin (BXB) VOL. 3

Bitcoin is drastically expanding in Germany and in particular the capital city of Berlin.  Bitcoin Exchange Berlin will host their third meeting a week from tomorrow on Saturday, August 24 at the Platoon Kunsthalle Berlin to launch a marketplace to buy and sell a variety of products for BTC and additionally buy and sell BTC.  The main purpose of BXB has been to provide the opportunity for members of the Bitcoin community and those interested to meet offline and trade Bitcoins in person.  BXB also allows members of the Bitcoin community to meet and collaborate on ideas to not only expand the Bitcoin community but forward the currency to a higher level of prominence within Berlin, Germany, Europe and around the world.

Specifically on August 24, BXB will provide a marketplace setting for attendees to buy many kinds of products for Bitcoin.  Vendors are welcome to attend and on the spot, BXB staff and Bitcoiners will guide them through setting up wallets and printing out QR codes for their products.  Vendors who are interested can visit the BXB site to sign up in advance for this unique opportunity to not only sell their products but also learn more about Bitcoin and how to transact in this convenient, cost effective currency.  Rarely are merchants provided an opportunity to have a Bitcoin tutorial on the spot and then put the new currency in action by accepting Bitcoin for their products.

Additionally, attendees will have an opportunity to hear from Támas Blummer, founder and CEO of Bits of Proof.  Bits of Proof currently provides software for the BXB Market.  Throughout and at the conclusion of the evening, attendees are encouraged to trade Bitcoins with others in the old fashioned way and spend newly purchased Bitcoins on unique products from the many merchants present.  As usual, Bitcoin experts will be in attendance to answer any questions from attendees.
One of the perks is that entry to BXB is free for anyone interested.  Attendees are encouraged to set up a Bitcoin Wallet in advance to enjoy the full experience of the event and be prepared to purchase BTC and then in turn purchase some unique products from merchants in attendance.  Bitcoin Exchange Berlin brings out the best of the Bitcoin currency: peer to peer interaction and exchange.  If you are located in Germany or in Europe, Bitcoin Magazine encourages you to stop by BXB on Saturday, August 24.

Trust No US Companies With The Future Of Bitcoin

I would strongly recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States. –Ladar Levison

Secure email providers Lavabit and Silent Circle have taken the heroic steps of shutting down their businesses in order to preserve their integrity. Unfortunately the definition of heroism necessarily implies that their actions are heroic because they are unusual. Their actions surprised us because most companies, when faced between choosing between continued operation and honoring the trust their users have given them, toss integrity aside.

Even though Levinson was speaking in the context of communication providers, his words apply equally well to Bitcoin. A police state is no less interested in controlling the flows of money between its subjects than it is in monitoring and controlling the flows of communication.

2013 was a great and terrible year for US Bitcoin companies. Several high profile companies received significant venture backing, which is good insofar as a recognition of their success and growth potential. However this also puts them in a hostage situation.

The investors backing these companies naturally want to not only receive a return on their investment, but to have the principle itself returned. This natural desire to get their money back serves as an effective means of control over them by bureaucrats who are capable of using their legal power to make the value of those investments evaporate on a whim. Because of this risk and others, venture capitalists normally insist on gaining significant control over the companies they invest in. This means that you should expect that when the US government says, “jump”, every venture-funded Bitcoin company will reply, “how high?” Hoping they will all have the courage of Lavabit is unrealistic.

From its inception, Bitcoin was destined to come into conflict with laws and regulators in the same way P2P file sharing did, and from its inception some people respond to Bitcoin’s potential by suggesting that it be changed to make it more compatible with the systems of legal control it was designed to evade.

Some of the proposals which have been suggested in the past include: adding the capability to reverse transactions, confiscation of balances, creating a central authority that can whitelist and/or blacklist addresses, and requiring all users to register their wallets with a government agency. So far none of these have been implemented into the protocol but the pressure to do so is will only continue to increase, especially by venture-funded companies, especially in the USA.

Ultimately it will be up to the international Bitcoin community to resist these pressures. The US government has a long reach, but non-US Bitcoin users have the ability to operate beyond it if they choose to develop that capability. It would be an enormously positive sign for Bitcoin if communities in Europe, Russia, China, and Latin America started their own development initiatives.

Bits of Proof and btcd are positive steps towards making the Bitcoin protocol resistant to arbitrary change by a small group. The best possible outcome for the network is to be composed of heterogeneous nodes, consisting of independent implementations which only implement protocol changes via a standardization process which involves near-universal consensus.

The single best step the global Bitcoin community could take to ensure this outcome is to create and fund projects that implement alternate Bitcoin implementations in a manner independent of any US person, company, or organization.

Bitcoin promises to be a neutral and international monetary standard, which provides a level playing field for participants all over the world. In order to realize this potential, it must be protected from the controlling influences of any single government, even if this causes some short term difficulty for Bitcoin users and companies under the control of one of those governments. It’s time for users around the world to step up and make sure not all their Bitcoin eggs are trapped in the US basket.

India Takes a Hands Off Approach Towards Bitcoin

india-flag

The second most populated country in the world is stepping up to the plate to consider Bitcoin and provide this digital, decentralized cryptocurrency an opportunity to flourish prior to regulating.  With a population of over 1,232,530,000, India is a hotspot of potential for growth of the Bitcoin currency and community.  Right on the top of the list of the most tech-oriented nations, India will take a leap forward should the Reserve Bank of India truly take a hands off approach towards the Bitcoin currency.  As the Indian Rupee is calling for attention with higher rates of inflation, the Reserve Bank of India has voiced intentions of increasing the value of the Rupee and just keeping an eye on Bitcoin.

With a hands off approach, the Reserve Bank of India, has provided more time for the Bitcoin community in India to advance and expand before any concrete guidelines are put in place.  The Bitcoin community in India can use this gift of time to develop Bitcoin related businesses in the space and also educate Indian citizens on the many opportunities for economic growth associated with Bitcoin.  Should the Indian government impose guidelines down the road, the Bitcoin community will be prepared.

In the US, the Bitcoin community is experiencing a different narrative.  Early this week, the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee sent a letter to various executive agencies seeking more insight on the procedures, plans and policies already in place for regulating the Bitcoin currency.  Bitcoin businesses in the US have less time to advance in a deregulated space.  Fortunately to date, the US Senate is seeking clarity and not further regulations, but time is now of essence for the Bitcoin community in the US to safeguard against potential restrictions down the road.

While Bitcoin has continued to grow in prominence since 2009, the Indian government and in particular the Reserve Bank of India, RBI, would like to wait before putting in place any guidelines related to the currency.  RBI Spokesperson stated, “As of now we are watching and learning about the developments in Bitcoins but are not regulating it.”  The wait and see approach in the past has proven much more sound with technological development.  As the US Federal Government took a “wait and see” approach back in the early 2000s, the internet in turn had a chance to flourish and flourish it did.

Bitcoin Nordic: Buy CashU Vouchers with Bitcoins

Bitcoin Nordic’s Lasse Birk Olesen has announced that the company is now offering a way for Bitcoin users to purchase CashU coupons, an online payment mechanism accepted at hundreds of online locations including iTunes, Amazon, Skype and Xbox Live. CashU coupons are offered in denominations of $10, $30, $50, $100 and $300, and are set to the buyer’s email address within 24 hours of purchase.

From the average Bitcoin user’s perspective, the fees are high; Bitcoin Nordic charges a transaction fee of 10% on every purchase. Thus, the service is not likely to be significantly used by anyone with the option of simply paying for iTunes or Amazon products with a credit card; among the North American and European Bitcoin communities, its only users are likely to be those Bitcoin users that have Bitcoin-paying jobs and almost no fiat currency income at all. However, there is one place where the service is likely to be of great value: North Africa and the Middle East. In North Africa and the Middle East, many people do not have credit cards, and a considerable number do not even have bank accounts, and CashU has become an extremely popular alternative. However, that is not because of its low fees; for purchasing CashU vouchers with a credit card, for example, CashU charges 5% in addition to an implicit fee from currency conversion on the part of your bank. Other purchase mechanisms, like Fawry and Ukash, have even higher fees, in some cases up to 9%. Thus, compared to these alternatives, Bitcoin Nordic’s fee is only slightly higher, and Olesen intends to lower it over there is enough volume to do so.

But ultimately even a 10% fee does not matter all that much, because the combination of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Nordic’s service provides North African and Middle Eastern residents with a unique service that no other payment system comes close to offering: access to the North American and European online labor markets. Using Bitcoin, writers, graphic designers, developers and translators in North Africa or the Middle East can earn relatively high salaries doing freelance work for various individuals and businesses in the United States, Canada and the EU, and with Bitcoin Nordic’s service they can quickly convert the money into a form that they can immediately spend on their own needs. Normally, under such circumstances PayPal comes to mind, but in this case PayPal proves to be of very limited value; the reason is that PayPal transactions are reversible, whereas CashU transactions are irreversible, preventing CashU from accepting PayPal as a funding option – if it did, fraudulent buyers would purchase CashU units with PayPal, quickly spend them on goods, and then cancel the PayPal transaction. UKash is also irreversible and international, so it is CashU compatible, but it suffers from high fees and obscurity; as mentioned above, conversion fees are over 9%, and right now, at least according to Google Trends, Bitcoin appears to be about five times as popular as UKash is.

Situations like these are perfect examples of where Bitcoin can truly shine. Even in environments where banking infrastructure is scant or nonexistent, the economy is often ravaged by political turmoil or war, and financial institutions from Europe or the US see no profit (or too much risk) in participating, as long as someone, somewhere can put up an internet connection everyone is potentially within reach of help. When making one of the three first ever large-scale “massive open online courses” in late 2011, Stanford University professor Sebastian Thrun received the following email from one of his students in Afghanistan:

I spent the last few days under incoming mortar and rocket attacks, then dodging checkpoints under questionable legal status to exfiltrate a war zone to a third world air field until things settled down. I had about an hour of fairly solid internet connectivity to be able to get the assignments done, and still managed a respectable score. This is a typical week here for me.

Despite the cultural barriers, despite the hardship and despite the war, stories like these show the sheer determination and will of the local people to lift themselves out of their predicament – and in this case, the internet allowed a university professor in California to help this man take one step toward perhaps, eventually, actually doing so. Now, imagine this man getting a programming job with bitcoins, and eventually buying his family plane tickets out to Europe. At least one Arabian airline accepts CashU; if Udacity succeeded in inspiring the student to further develop his programming talents to a reasonable level, it would not even be particularly hard.

The above is certainly not meant to promote the unfortunate stereotype that the Middle East and North Africa are in their entirety war-torn hellholes; in reality, most of the countries in the region are fairly mundane and stable places, suffering mainly from lack of infrastructure and development and perhaps a moderate level of political oppression. In those environments, Bitcoin and CashU also play a massive role in providing a form of “banking for the unbanked”. Anyone earning bitcoins can use BitStamp as an ad-hoc bank account, converting out to CashU coupons when needed, and even this setup provides much more financial safety than, for example, holding large quantities of cash. In harsher environments, however, Bitcoin becomes even more necessary, and this fast and easy cashout method has just made using Bitcoin much more practical.

Bitcoin Goes to Washington: Bitcoin and Money Laundering: 2014 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill: Federal Bureau of Investigation

Bitcoin Goes to Washington

Bitcoin and Money Laundering: 2014 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill: Federal Bureau of Investigation

By Brian Cohen and Adam B. Levine

On the heels of today’s news that the New York Department of Financial Services  issued a Notice of Inquiry on Virtual Currencies and subpoenaed almost two dozen Bitcoin Companies, last week’s ruling in federal court, and the SEC’s recent action against the infamous Pirate40 (and consequently a Texas Federal Judge declaring “Bitcoin is a currency, or form of money”) and July’s DEA Bitcoin Asset Seizure, it seems Bitcoin is attracting more and more regulator attention in the US.

According to a recent release, the US Legislature has taken an interest as well.

The House of Representatives posted the 2014 Appropriations Bill for Commerce, Justice, Science and Related agencies which contains many things, but notably requests an FBI Briefing on the subject of Bitcoins and Money Laundering, to be available within 120 days of signing.  On July 23, 2013, As Reported by the Appropriations Committee, Mr. Wolf submitted the following…:

Text from Page 44 of the Bill:

Money laundering.—The Committee understands that Bitcoins

and other forms of peer-to-peer digital currency are a potential means for criminal, terrorist or other illegal organizations and individuals to illegally launder and transfer money. News reports indicate that Bitcoins may have been used to help finance the flight  and activity of fugitives. The Committee directs the FBI, in consultation with the Department and other Federal partners, to provide a briefing no later 120 days after the enactment of this Act  on the nature and scale of the risk posed by such ersatz currency, both in financing illegal enterprises and in undermining financial  institutions. The briefing should describe the FBI efforts in the context of a coordinated Federal response to this challenge, and identify staffing and other resources devoted to this effort.

Text via Congress.gov

PDF via House.gov

The cash-like nature of Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin seem to be fundamentally at odds with the identity-based financial systems we’ve used since the advent of the internet.  What the bitcoin-using community sees as the advantages of Bitcoin; trustless and irrevocable transactions divorced of official identity.  In another light this can be seen as enabling money laundering, consumer fraud and terrorism.

“It is natural for established industries and their representatives in the Senate to fear new and disruptive technologies.” explained Andreas M. Antopoulos, Expert on decentralized networks  “As with the early Internet, there are those who only look at the empowering effects on criminals, rather than on the vast majority of people who can benefit enormously. It just takes time for the lawmakers and laws to catch up to the technology and adapt”

Although its not entirely clear if the reference is to a United States fugitive or not, the neutral nature of Bitcoin makes this a very difficult issue to effectively address:

“News reports indicate that Bitcoins may have been used to help finance the flight  and activity of fugitives.”

Most  recently, Edward Snowden became a bitcoin-accepting persona-non-grata via Julian Assange’s Wikileaks.

Jon Matonis Executive Director of the Bitcoin Foundation explained in his article on Forbes last year how Wikileaks began accepting Bitcoin in “WikiLeaks Bypasses Financial Blockade With Bitcoin

Wikileaks has received 3,786.53428743 BTC

while the Journalistic Source Protection Defence Fund for Edward Snowden has received 28.1635503 BTC

as of 8/12/2013 8:20 EST

Donations may not give the entire picture as Jon Matonis pointed out in his article that

“…these amounts may be significantly higher, because it does not even include the individually-generated bitcoin addresses that WikiLeaks provides for donors upon request.”

WikiLeaks began accepting Bitcoin more than two years ago on June 14th, 2011.

What does this mean for Bitcoin?  Attention from ever-more arms of governments around the world on the one hand lends credibility to the concept of cryptocurrency.  After all, if it wasn’t a powerful concept governments wouldn’t lower themselves, devoting time and resources to address it.   On the other hand, it’s another step down the path towards clarity which can be either good or bad.  For all its benefits, Cryptocurrency may be simply too dangerous to keep in the hands of its current users.   Stay tuned for further developments.

This article was originally published on Let’s Talk Bitcoin! and is in regards to the House Bill.  

To see whats going on in the Senate, see Bitcoin Shakes Up Congress  by Bitcoin Magazine’s Elizabeth Ploshay.  

Bitcoin Shakes Up Congress

7459091840_2a11bd49cc_o-1

Bitcoin is on the map in Congress as this morning as Politico, a leading newspaper and website predominantly read by Capitol Hill Staff Members and Congress published an article entitled, “Congress Starts Looking Into Bitcoin.”  What does this mean for the Bitcoin community, Congress and the US Executive Branch? Ideally, Members of Congress and the US Senate will take a closer and more holistic look into how regulators have been handling Bitcoin and will proceed with regulations or lack thereof.  While, it would be even more ideal for Bitcoin to have more time to flourish prior to catching the eye of Congress, the Bitcoin community now has a golden opportunity to rise to the occasion and share the truth on the merits, value and utility of Bitcoin, not just as an international currency but also as a symbol of freedom of speech.

The US Senate is now looking to rein in regulators to ensure that Congress has a full understanding of Bitcoin and additional digital cryptocurrencies prior to any further regulation.  On the heels of Senator Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) statement in 2011 that Bitcoin is an “online form of money laundering,” members of the US Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee would like to clarify the purposes for and utility of Bitcoin through issuing a report on digital currency.  Members of the committee sent letters to several executive agencies requesting disclosure of their virtual currency policies, how these policies have been developed and plans moving forward.  As Senator Schumer may be preparing to take on digital currencies including Bitcoin again, some Members of Congress and Senators are working to learn more about this digital, decentralized cryptocurrency prior to any further talk of regulations.

The US Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee’s proactive step can be viewed in a positive light.  One promising quote from the committee’s letter reads, “as with all emerging technologies, the federal government must make sure that potential threats and risks are dealt with swiftly…However, we must also ensure that rash or uninformed actions don’t stifle a potentially valuable technology.” US House and Senate staff members are coming to grips that they may be behind the eight ball in terms of learning about tech friendly issues and advancements before it is too late.  After the New York Financial Services Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky sent out subpoenas to 22 Bitcoin related businesses and voiced consideration of further regulations, Members of the US House, Senate and Congressional Staff see a clear need to learn about Bitcoin, a digital currency that has caught the eye of money and now sits at a price of 106 USD/BTC.

It is key for Members of the Bitcoin Community to highlight the US Congress’s choice in the past to give up attempting to crack down on e-commerce and how as a result online businesses have flourished and benefitted not only the US economy but global community.  What if Congress had cracked down on development of the internet, e-commerce, etc back in the early 2000’s? Well, you most likely would not be reading this article on your smart phone and Members of Congress, Senators and staff would certainly not be able to follow up to the minute votes and legislative action on their blackberries. This truth must come out. The success of the Bitcoin currency today is just a glimpse of what is to come in terms of expediency and economic growth around the world. Bitcoin Magazine encourages you to learn more about the stand your government is taking towards Bitcoin and the concept of a digital, decentralized, cryptocurrency and from there learn the positions of your local, state and national leaders. It takes one individual to share the validity of the Bitcoin currency and from there open the door to constructive dialogue.

First Virtual Currencies Compliance Conference tomorrow

On Wednesday, August 14th, the first Virtual Currencies Compliance Conference will take place at the New York City Bar Association, hosted by the National Money Transmitters Association. The meeting will be chaired by Constance Choi, General Counsel of Payward Inc and a founding member of the Digital Asset Transfer Authority (“DATA”), a new self-regulatory body created by a number of major Bitcoin and digital asset-related businesses both in the United States and abroad. The meeting will have nine compliance experts speak in interactive sessions: former American Express Travelers Cheque and Prepaid Service Group counsel Judith Rinearson, commercial litigator and business attorney Marco Santori, Patton Boggs’ Government Investigations and Litigation practice group chair and former Department of Justice attorney Samuel Rosenthal, Perkins Coie litigator Jean Jacques Cabou, Unidos Financial Services cofounder and compliance risk manager Juan Llanos, Navigant Consulting’s Director of Global Investigations and Compliance Robert Pargac, AML Experts Inc president Connie Fenchel, National Money Transmitters Association director David Landsman and, most notably, former FinCEN director James H Freis Jr.

The schedule for the meeting can be found on the NMTA website; the event will start with a continental breakfast at 8:00, and at 9:00 the actual presentations will begin to take place. The conference will be organized into four one-and-a-half hour blocks, with each block containing two or three presentations, and two coffee breaks and a lunch break in between. At the end of the conference the day will finish with a networking cocktail mixer from 17:15-19:00. After that, the conference will formally end, but there will also be an optional discussion on lobbying and self-regulatory strategies.

This conference is notable because it shows well the effort that big Bitcoin businesses are taking to integrate themselves into the mainstream, and the mainstream’s willingness to take them seriously. This is a conference that, despite attempts to frame it around a wider issue of “virtual currencies”, is essentially about Bitcoin, and major players from the financial industry and self-regulatory and government regulatory agencies are seeing it fit to take the time to speak to this audience. Some may argue that the government’s wheels have simply only started to turn, and we will see much more active attempts to suppress Bitcoin in the years to come, but for the time being relationships between the US Bitcoin business community and government regulators appear to be surprisingly positive – a state of affairs that those in organizations like DATA are striving hard to maintain.

Brian Santos is offering extended early bird pricing, allowing anyone who wishes to attend to buy a ticket to the conference for $295 – paying bitcoins if necessary. Contact brian@uptweet.com for more details.

Feathercoin: Interview With Peter Bushnell

In this past month, it seems like alternate cryptocurrencies have been all the rage. Earlier last month, Sunny King released Primecoin, a prime-number based cryptocurrency that is the first to attempt to make its mining algorithm simultaneously serve some kind of social value, and the currency was mentioned on BusinessInsider less than two days after launch. The currency then grew quickly, getting its own gambling site and exchange within three days. The surprising thing is that Primecoin is not unique in this. Over the past two years, we have seen the development of over seventy alternate currencies with features ranging from a smaller or larger number of coins to faster confirmations and radically different alternatives to Bitcoin’s proof of work.

One of the less radical alternatives in the alternative cryptocurrency, or “altcoin”, scene is Feathercoin, a currency introduced by Peter Bushnell on April 16, 2013. On a technical level, Feathercoin started off not being significantly different from Litecoin; the only change was an increase in the final currency supply from 84 million to 336 million. Later on, however, the currency developed other small differences; one change is faster difficulty retargets, allowing the network to adjust more quickly to changes in network power. Another is an advanced checkpointing system, which lead developer Peter Bushnell says will make Feathercoin “more resilient to 51% attacks than Bitcoin or Litecoin.” More importantly, however,Bushnell explains, the real attraction of altcoins is not necessarily just the minor details of their core features, but also the surrounding ecosystem. The ecosystem around Bitcoin is bloated; major changes to the main client are always met with great opposition, and for good reason – a billion dollar economy depends on it. “Feathercoin,” Bushnell writes, “by comparison is dynamic and agile. It is hard for people to get involved in Bitcoin in the same way that they could be involved in Feathercoin, we are still young and look to remain open to new people and ideas. Feathercoin has proved that it is able to evolve when faced with problems and looks to become more resilient than Bitcoin.”

Some of the newest developments around Feathercoin include the United Open Currency Solutions Group (UNOCS), an advocacy group made in collaboration with WorldCoin and PhenixCoin, a system to protect against attacks known as “advanced checkpointing”, and an E-bay style marketplace. Feathercoin now has the sixth largest market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies, placing it above Novacoin, Primecoin and Devcoin but below PPCoin, Namecoin and the “big three” of Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ripple. In this interview, Peter Bushnell shares his thoughts on why he created Feathercoin, the current situation that alternative currencies are in, and the promise that they offer for the future.


Vitalik Buterin: What’s your personal background? What were you involved in before Bitcoin, and how did you first find out about Bitcoin? What about the currency interested you?

Peter Bushnell: For the last eleven years I have been working as Head of IT at Brasenose College which is one of the colleges that make up Oxford University. It is a long time to be in any one place and now that I’m working with crypto currencies life is a lot more fast-paced and infinitely more interesting. I first heard of Bitcoin from New Scientist many years ago, before I actually become involved myself. When I first arrived on the scene in late 2011 I started mining Bitcoin, which was very unsatisfactory as I could only mine 0.1 coins a day. I was not mining as a means to make some money but just to play and collect some coins; I have always had an enthusiasm for technology and computers which is why I ended up working in IT professionally. Finally, I found Litecoin, which at the time was very young and had hardly any value, and the joy of Litecoin was that I could actually mine many of them. When I first found Litecoin there was a fair bit of enthusiasm surrounding it, and many saw it co-existing happily with Bitcoin – which I believed to be true.

What interested me about Bitcoin was the fact that it worked. When I read the New Scientist article I was intrigued as I imagined it would be a tough task getting a value attached to these Bitcoins, but there the markets were which gave Bitcoin its value and allowed the whole world to trade with one another almost instantly without having to use the traditional and costly banking systems.

Vitalik: What made you decide to create an alternative cryptocurrency?

Peter: I am a big supporter of Litecoin, but I found that it had run out of steam as there seemed to be little effort to progress, my emails to Litecoin devs went unanswered and I had to question what I really knew about Litecoin. Having a Scrypt coin made sense as GPU miners were soon to be looking for a new home with the coming of ASIC miners, and I was waiting for another Scrypt coin to jump on to and had in my mind what I wanted ideally. Mincoin came along, but it launched without a Qt GUI and had very large rewards for initial blocks. This seemed largely unfair. We then saw the Russian Novacoin launch which was pre-mined before it was launched to the public, and I also saw that as unfair.

I had the idea of a coin that simply followed on what Litecoin had started with Bitcoin by having four times as many coins as Litecoin; that seemed to be the next natural step. It occurred that I could code the coin myself, which is exactly what I did. The good news since Feathercoin launched is that Litecoin woke up and did something – competition is a good thing.

Vitalik: I understand it, Feathercoin’s only two technical differences from Litecoin are 4x faster difficulty retargets and 4x more coins. Why did you decide to change these aspects of Litecoin? Why are these features important? Are there any other differences between the two that I’m missing?

Peter: The core difference at the beginning was simply four times as many coins, like Litecoin having four times as many coins as Bitcoin. Since our launch we have changed to incorporate a four times quicker difficulty adjust which works better for a network smaller than that of Bitcoin or Litecoin. This shows the willingness to evolve to deal with problems that our network is faced with.

Right now, we are working on a feature known as advanced checkpointing. Currently blockchain checkpoints are compiled into the client which has to be redistributed. To protect against attackers orphaning genuine blocks, checkpoints will be issued after blocks have been created. Advanced Checkpointing prevents 51% attacks and is an example of where smaller coins contribute to all crypto currencies. Smaller coins have to deal with a lot of things that do not concern Bitcoin or Litecoin. With Advanced Checkpointing implemented Feathercoin will be more resilient to 51% attacks than Bitcoin or Litecoin.

Vitalik: Could you explain to me how this advanced checkpointing mechanism works?

Peter: Feathercoin experienced 51% attacks where the attackers managed to orphan genuine blocks and get their own mined blocks accepted by the network. This is very frustrating to the miners and exposes users to the risk of reversed transactions. Bitcoin includes a checkpointing system to solve this problem, where certain blocks can be hardcoded into the client so that your client will only ever connect to the blockchain with those blocks in it.

Advanced Checkpointing works by providing a feed of checkpoints that clients subscribe to. When a block gets created it will be checkpointed automatically by a single node in the first iteration of the software. This checkpoint will be put into a feed which other clients will be subscribed to. The other clients will pick up this checkpoint and will start rejecting blockchains that do not include the block referenced in the checkpoint. This is not mandatory as clients can opt-out. If the feed goes down, the network carries on as normal and when the feed comes back it starts checkpointing from the end of the network blockchain.

This system needs to be distributed to be made more resilient and move away from the centralization that this introduces. This solution upsets the purists but is the lesser of two evils. We have experienced several 51% attacks on the Feathercoin network and we would rather see the network out of attackers’ hands. The attackers that have been targeting us have 3GH Scrypt or 3TH SHA-256 of mining power. The attackers have excellent knowledge of exactly how the network operates and have run some impressive attacks. Our hashrate is to high for them to attack Feathercoin right now but they could get more hash power but for now they have moved on to other smaller coins. With attackers like this out there everyone should be worried.

Vitalik: If someone on the street (or the internet) asked you “why should I use Feathercoin?”, how would you answer?

Peter: Feathercoin is a very active coin with a lot of enthusiasm. We have very different pressures compared to Bitcoin which is making us evolve much faster than the lumbering giant that Bitcoin has become. It is indeed hard for Bitcoin to move too fast without creating a lot of upset. Feathercoin by comparison is dynamic and agile. I always encourage people to visit the Feathercoin forum as anyone can get involved. We are a transparent coin with an active community. It is hard for people to get involved in Bitcoin in the same way that they could be involved in Feathercoin, we are still young and look to remain open to new people and ideas. Feathercoin has proved that it is able to evolve when faced with problems and looks to become more resilient than Bitcoin.

Vitalik: Much of the Feathercoin community’s emphasis so far, as I understand, has been on creating better software, tutorials, marketplaces and the like. Why not simply make better software, tutorials and marketplaces for Bitcoin?

Peter: We need diversity if something is going to survive, it is simply the survival of the fittest. A lot of people complained that Litecoin was going to damage cryptocurrency, which to me seemed absurd as Litecoin was clearly trying something new. What I find disappointing is how many people with Litecoin in their pockets now throw stones at Feathercoin for those same reasons. Having many coins trying different things will allow us to explore what works in cryptocurrency; as long as these coins have some value on the market then they can be used to send money around the world.

Vitalik: What is your opinion on the state of alternative cryptocurrencies in general?

Peter: I believe that cryptocurrencies right now are in a bit of a lull. There are some major obstacles that we are faced with which makes things seem a bit gloomy to some. Gox is a good example of the troubles experienced dealing with banks and payment processors. What people do not realize is that are so many people working to solve some of these obstacles and there are already several solutions coming on to the horizon. The world of cryptocurrency is going to look very different in a couple of years’ time.

Vitalik: What role do you see alternative cryptocurrencies playing in the future? Do you expect any of them to overtake Bitcoin in the near or mid-term future? If so, what would be some of the factors driving such an outcome?

Peter: Alternative cryptocurrencies is where we are going to see the real technical progress made. Bitcoin needs to try and maintain a steady course, whereas the other currencies can evolve much faster. Feathercoin has more coins than Bitcoin by design so that it can exist as a lower value coin. This is supposed to remain true, and Feathercoin should not threaten Bitcoin’s value directly. Since Feathercoin is an open source project leaves, any innovations made in the client can be picked up by Bitcoin. As long as Bitcoin remains active and adapts then I expect it to remain a strong force for cryptocurrency adoption.

Vitalik: Feathercoin, Worldcoin and PhenixCoin recently partnered to form the “United Open Currencies Solutions Group”. Could you explain in more detail what this organization is, and what its objectives are?

Peter: The idea behind UNOCS is that working together we can do more than apart. UNOCS gives us a name under which we can undertake joint projects. I would like to see more coins work together rather than just view everyone else as a threat. It’s not a merger; even though we have this partnership together, we are all still independent coins. The organization’s first project will be the UNOCS Bridge, which allows merchants to accept all UNOCS coins without having to wait for transactions as all the coins are held in the system. The system handles exchanging between coins and eventually will allow people to move to fiat. That is the long term goal – to ease movement between crypto and fiat. here does seem to be a lot of people working towards solutions like this which I find very reassuring, as moving from fiat to crypto and back can be far more difficult than it should be. I find that the legacy banking seems to be somewhat hostile to cryptocurrency.

Vitalik: What are some of your future plans with Feathercoin, both in the near and long term?

Peter: The main objective of Feathercoin is to survive long term, to continue to adapt to the world it finds itself in. There are many opportunities for cryptocurrency and we do not intend to miss them. There are places in the world local currency is having trouble where cryptocurrencies could be a real solution, we are looking to lower entry requirements to cryptocurrency by implementing SMS based wallets. This increases access to Feathercoin in places that do not have high end smart phones available. I hope that cryptocurrency can solve some of the financial problems that the world faces today, giving anyone with a basic phone access to a cryptocurrency account puts a lot of power back into the hands of the people. You can see that all these efforts are working to a time where cryptocurrency finds its critical mass. Cryptocurrency is going to be the biggest technical innovation since the birth of the Internet.

Critical Vulnerability Found In Android Wallets

A critical security vulnerability has been found in Android which renders bitcoins stored in Android Bitcoin wallets vulnerable to theft, and the exploit is currently being used in the wild to steal people’s bitcoins. Several people have reported that their Android wallets were cleared out and the funds sent to 1HKywxiL4JziqXrzLKhmB6a74ma6kxbSDj, an address which currently contains 55.8 BTC. Because the bug is a flaw in Android itself, all Android Bitcoin wallets are vulnerable; Bitcoin Wallet for Android, Bitcoin Spinner, the mobile version of blockchain.info and Mycelium Wallet are all on the list. Users are encouraged to send all of their funds to a desktop or online wallet and wait until their favorite mobile wallet comes out with an upgrade to fix the problem. Bitcoin Wallet for Android already did; Bitcoin Wallet for Android users need only download the latest version from the play store and the wallet will move insecure funds to a new secure address automatically.

The source of the bug is the java.security.SecureRandom method in Android, which, as developer Andreas Schildbach describes it “has multiple severe bugs that render it useless for cryptographic purposes.” The problem is this: the elliptic curve digital signature algorithm, which Bitcoin transactions rely on for security, has three inputs: the transaction, the signer’s private key and a random number. The algorithm then outputs two values, denoted r and s, where s is calculated with the formula k-1(z+rd), z being the hash of the message, k the random number and d the private key. r is dependent only on k. Thus, if the owner of an address signs two transactions with the same random number (and of course the same private key, as every address is linked to one private key), one can extract two s values from the two signatures, subtract them to make the rd terms cancel out, and extracting the private key from there becomes a simple division problem (a more detailed writeup can be found here). Normally, this is not a problem; given a true random number generator, the first “collision” should take place roughly at the same time as the heat death of the universe. As it turned out, however, java.security.SecureRandom proved to be not so random, generating the same “random” number twice on many occasions.

It is because of the possibility of clever attacks like this that Bitcoin developers recommend a simple strategy: never re-using the same address twice. Whenever money is sent from a Bitcoin address, the wallet should empty out the entire contents of that address, send as much as needed to the intended recipient, and send the rest of the funds to other, previously unused addresses, controlled by the wallet. Not doing this does not mean that your funds are insecure; the exploit here relies on the weakness of Java’s random number generator, and given a proper random number generator (eg. os.urandom) elliptic curve DSA remains as strong as ever. However, if the implementation turns out to be somewhat flawed it does leave you vulnerable, and even in normal cases address re-use weakens Bitcoin’s privacy. If some mad scientist in an underground cave suddenly appears with a fully-functional quantum computer, only addresses that have never been spent from will be safe. The reason is that if you have bitcoins in an address that you never sent any transactions from, there is very little information that attackers have to figure out your private key; in fact, the 34-character string is all an attacker has to go on. And even that doesn’t help much; the hash algorithms used to derive the address are extremely secure, and will hold their own even against a quantum computer.

This event should also be a wake-up call to Bitcoin users to look at other potential flaws in their wallet security. There have been many instances of Bitcoin users having their wallets hacked through little fault of their own, with attackers grabbing their passwords through Android root privileges, Java keyloggers and worse; if you are holding a large number of bitcoins, you would do well to store them in a wallet that you use as little as possible. Keeping a separate spending and savings wallet should be the norm; ideally, you should use some kind of mixer to send money between the two to preserve privacy. Today, the problem is insecure random number generators. Tomorrow, it might be a breakthrough in repurposing Bitcoin mining ASICs to cracking brainwallets. Or another integer overflow. Or a multi-confirmation double-spend attack made possible by hacking into some Electrum servers or forging blockchain.info’s SSL certificate. The lesson here is this: there is still a long way to go before we iron out all of the security flaws that Bitcoin implementations might have. The traditional financial system has had forty years, and even they aren’t done.

What Libbitcoin and SX are And Why They Matter

Amir Taaki’s libbitcoin has come to be one of the most advanced alternative implementations of the Bitcoin protocol in existence. Although there are now dozens of alternative implementations on the market, libbitcoin is one of the few that re-implements the complete Bitcoin standard, allowing users to run a deterministic wallet, an elliptic curve message signing interface and, of course, a fully functional Bitcoin node. Even multisignature transactions, which many popular wallets including blockchain.info and Bitcoin Wallet for Android still do not support, libbitcoin handles just fine. Libbitcoin is also unique in its modularity; the package itself is a software library, containing a set of components each of which can be programmatically called individually, avoiding the need to start up a fully fledged, monolithic software daemon just to make a few simple transactions or queries. If you want a full client running locally, you can use libbitcoin to do that, but you can also just as easily only use libbitcoin for transaction management and networking and rely on other nodes for transaction data. Whatever you need, you use, and whatever you don’t need you simply don’t bother with.

As the first major practical application of libbitcoin, Amir Taaki has recently released sx, a set of command line utilities for working with Bitcoin keys and transactions. The basic intent is simple: empower Bitcoin users who are somewhat technically skilled, but not experienced programmers, to interact with Bitcoin not just as an interface where they type in an amount and a destination address and bitcoind does everything for them, but also work directly with the underlying building blocks. Every sx tool follows the Unix philosophy: it does one thing, and it does it well. genaddr takes an Electrum wallet seed or master public key and an index and returns an address. mktx creates unsigned transactions, and sign-input signs transaction inputs. history returns a list of unspent transactions associated with a Bitcoin address that can be used as inputs – and so on.

These tools can be accessed on the command line to construct Bitcoin transactions one step at a time, or one can call them programatically (eg. with os.popen(command).read() in Python) to create Bitcoin software like merchant packages and wallets. Up until now, creating a new Bitcoin wallet was difficult – one would need to either re-implement everything from scratch, take an existing wallet and work hard to untangle the code to separate out the transaction logic from the wallet logic, or rely on a bitcoind node running in the background. With libbitcoin and sx, however, the tools to work with Bitcoin transactions on the lowest level are already there – freeing developers to work on the problems that truly need the most work – like optimizing security and the user experience.

More Than Just A Library

So why do libbitcoin and SX matter? As it turns out, the answer goes far beyond the simple fact that they’re convenient. One of the main problems with the Bitcoin ecosystem is that although Bitcoin is nominally decentralized, in reality the miners that keep the network running are all running the same piece of core Bitcoin software: bitcoind. Bitcoind is the “headless” (ie. command line only) version of the original Bitcoin client that has been developed ever since Satoshi released the first version in 2009, and serves as the software that all miners and nearly all businesses use to communicate with the Bitcoin network.

This is unhealthy for two reasons. First, having a monopoly can potentially lead to highly disruptive blockchain forks; for example, in March this year the removal of a database bug preventing bitcoind nodes from processing a block simultaneously affecting the status of more than 5,000 transactions caused the Bitcoin network to split in half for about six hours as nodes with the bug and without the bug disagreed on the validity of a block and started working on two separate blockchains. The fix: the Bitcoin community came together and agreed to shut down the version 0.8 nodes, and added the database bug to the official protocol for two months until it could be removed in a controlled way two months later. If there were instead five different Bitcoin implementations in active and widespread use, the failure of any one would only affect a small portion of the Bitcoin network – and ordinary users’ clients, which typically only verify transactions and not blocks, would probably not be affected at all as, in the event of a fork, the “legitimate” blockchain would nearly always be the one commanding a majority of the network.

The second reason is political. Many core bitcoind developers, particularly lead developer Gavin Andresen, are also part of the Bitcoin Foundation, an organization which has taken clear steps toward using political lobbying as a strategy for protecting Bitcoin. The fear is that, in the future, the government might try to regulate Bitcoin more, and give the foundation an ultimatum: you include certain privacy-eroding features (a moderate example might be an “address validation fee” to discourage people from covering their tracks by creating many Bitcoin addresses) in the protocol, or we ban Bitcoin exchanges. The Foundation may well comply, and the US government knows it. If the Foundation did not have the power to make these kinds of changes to the protocol without widespread international consent, however, then the US government would not have this option – they would be forced to either try banning Bitcoin outright, at the cost of massive goodwill among the tech and open-source community at the very least, or let it be and focus on softer regulatory strategies. This is why Bitcoin advocates like Amir Taaki, Joerg Platzer and others have long supported diversifying and internationalizing the Bitcoin ecosystem. And libbitcoin just might be the catalyst that finally sets the process going.

How do you use SX?

Installing sx is very simple if you’re on Linux; on the command line, wget http://sx.dyne.org/install-sx.sh followed by sudo bash ./install-sx.sh is all it takes. If you’re on Windows or Mac, things are somewhat more complicated, although not more so than any other similar software package; the source code is available for download at https://github.com/genjix/sx, and from there you can install it manually.

Once sx is installed, here are some of the things you can do with it. First, the basic address and key manipulations.

Generate a private key/public key/address triple:

sx newkey > pk1
cat pk1 | sx pubkey > pub1
cat pk1 | sx addr > addr1
cat pk1 pub1 addr1

Generate private key/address pairs from an Electrum wallet:

sx newseed > seed
for x in `seq 0 9`; do cat seed | sx genpriv $x; cat seed | sx genaddr $x; done

Generate just the addresses from a master public key:

cat seed | sx mpk > mpk
for x in `seq 0 9`; do cat mpk | sx genaddr $x; done

Transactions

Now, it’s time to get into transactions. First, a little understanding is needed as to how transactions work. Bitcoin does not have the concept of “accounts”; instead, a transaction spending money from an address must directly reference some transactions sending at least an equal amount of money to that address; these are usually called “previous transaction outputs”. For example, if you have an address to which you sent 2 BTC, 3 BTC and then 4 BTC and want to spend 5 BTC, you are not spending 5 BTC out of that address; rather, you are spending the 2 BTC and 3 BTC transaction outputs. Additionally, an output cannot be “partially spent”; even if you only want to send 0.1 BTC, you must consume an entire output. You can avoid wasting 1.9 BTC by adding a special output to the transaction, called “change”, where you send the remaining funds back to yourself.

The basic command that you will use to get these unspent transaction outputs is sx history:

sx history `cat addr1`

However, this by itself returns all transactions connected to that address, not just the ones we want, so we need to filter the output a bit. This is a complicated script; basically, it first looks for the word “Unspent” in the history and gets those lines plus the transaction data in the two lines above them. Then, it uses grep and awk to extract just the data that we need. Note that the command returns values in satoshis; 100 million satoshis equal 1 BTC. Send 0.001 BTC to the address contained in the addr1 file (cat addr1 to see it, and sx qrcode `cat addr1` qrcode.png to generate a scannable QR code), and run the following command:

sx history `cat addr1` | grep Unspent -B 2 | grep output | awk '{print $2}' > input
cat input

Now that we have the history, let’s use sx to create and send a transaction.

sx mktx txfile.tx `cat input` -o 18qk7SqRHuS4Kf3f6dmsvqqv7iw1xy77Z6:90000
sx rawscript dup hash160 [ `cat addr1 | sx decode-addr` ] equalverify checksig > raw.script
cat pk1 | sx sign-input txfile.tx 0 `cat raw.script` > sig
sx rawscript [ `cat sig` ] [ `cat pub1` ] | sx set-input txfile.tx 0 > txfile2.tx; mv txfile2.tx txfile.tx
sx broadcast-tx txfile.tx

Here’s what to do if you have multiple transaction inputs you want to spend. Send 0.0002 BTC to your address five times, and run the above sx history command again and make sure that it returns five outputs. To avoid having to copy and paste five transaction inputs by hand, we’ll do a little more command line magic:

sx history `cat addr1` | grep Unspent -B 2 | grep output | awk '{print $2}' > temp1
cat temp1 | sed 's/^/-i /' | tr '\n' ' ' > temp2
cat temp2

Notice how temp2 contains all the inputs in exactly the right format for sx mktx. Now, we just splice them in:

sx mktx txfile.tx `cat temp2` -o 18qk7SqRHuS4Kf3f6dmsvqqv7iw1xy77Z6:90000
sx rawscript dup hash160 [ `cat addr1 | sx decode-addr` ] equalverify checksig > raw.script
for x in `seq 0 4`; do cat pk1 | sx sign-input txfile.tx $x `cat raw.script` > sig$x; done
for x in `seq 0 4`; do sx rawscript [ `cat sig$x` ] [ `cat pub1` ] | sx set-input txfile.tx $x > txfile2.tx; mv txfile2.tx txfile.tx; done
sx broadcast-tx txfile.tx,

The Holy Grail: Multisignature Transactions

First we’ll generate 3 sets of private keys, pubkeys and addresses.

for x in `seq 1 3`; do sx newkey > pk$x; done
for x in `seq 1 3`; do cat pk$x | sx pubkey > pub$x; done
for x in `seq 1 3`; do cat pk$x | sx addr > addr$x; done

Then, we’ll create the multisig address.

sx rawscript 2 [ `cat pub1` ] [ `cat pub2` ] [ `cat pub3` ] 3 checkmultisig > msig.script
cat msig.script | sx showscript
cat msig.script | sx scripthash > 3addr
cat 3addr

Send 0.001 BTC to the address (doesn’t work with all wallets!) and then run the following to get the transaction hash:

sx history `cat 3addr` | grep Unspent -B 2 | grep output | awk '{print $2}' > input
cat input

Now, we need to construct the transaction and sign it, in this case using the first and third private keys (first and second or second and third work equally well). We’ll send only 50000 satoshis, leaving 0.0005 BTC as a fee.

sx mktx txfile.tx -i `cat input` -o 18qk7SqRHuS4Kf3f6dmsvqqv7iw1xy77Z6:50000
cat pk1 | sx sign-input txfile.tx 0 `cat msig.script` > sig1
cat pk3 | sx sign-input txfile.tx 0 `cat msig.script` > sig3
sx rawscript zero [ `cat sig1` ] [ `cat sig3` ] [ `cat msig.script` ] > input.script
cat input.script | sx set-input txfile.tx 0

And, finally, broadcast the transaction.

sx broadcast-tx txfile.tx

Fairly complicated, but multisignature transactions are not exactly simple in any case. With sx, however, the complexity is reduced to a series of steps that you can simply follow, or even incorporate into your own programs to run whenever you need to. Whether you’re a command line enthusiast, a Bitcoin developer or just someone interested in looking more deeply into how Bitcoin transactions work, sx is the tool for you. Happy hacking!

3dcart Partners with BitPay to Offer 16,000+ Merchants Transactions in Bitcoin

Just this afternoon, BitPay, Bitcoin’s lead payment processor, signed on 3dcart as its newest merchant. 3dcart serves as an online shopping cart platform with the aim of fostering online merchant and business growth. Through 3dcart’s partnership with BitPay, 3dcart merchants are now able to install and configure BitPay directly from 3dcart Store Managers.

3dcart was founded in 1997 and serves as an ecommerce platform designed to assist e-store owners. As a fully scalable and customizable service that is a Visa PCI Certified provider, 3dcart provides free 24/7/365 customer support and now has a new edge of offering merchants an opportunity to embrace Bitcoin.

Bitcoin Magazine had an opportunity to interview 3dcart’s Founder & CEO, Gonzalo Gil.

Bitcoin Magazine: When did you first hear about Bitcoin?

3dcart: I always try to stay on top of the latest industry technology, so when Bitcoins were first being talked about in early 2009, I began to follow its evolution.

BM: What was it about Bitcoin that you found interesting?

3dcart: As the CEO of an ecommerce company, I see incredible potential in Bitcoins as a self-regulating, peer-to-peer digital currency. Also, the simple fact that Bitcoins can be transferred across the world without the need of an intermediate financial institution is one aspect I find very interesting.

BM: When did you first get the idea for your business and what inspired you to create your website?

3dcart:  I started 3dcart in 1997 with little more than a few thousand dollars and an idea. Ecommerce, at that time, was still a relatively new concept, but I could see right away that it was an industry destined to explode in the near future. Knowing this, I created 3dcart and have done my best to grow the company into one of the most respected, and widely used, SaaS ecommerce solutions on the market.

BM: Were there any pre-existing businesses that inspired you to create your business?

3dcart: Ebay and Amazon were the big players in the industry in ’97, and they remain as such today. I’ve always admired their business model and commitment to the ecommerce industry, and I guess you can say both companies have inspired me in some way.

BM: Where do you see your business going in a year in light of your acceptance of Bitcoin?  

3dcart: At 3dcart, we’re all about helping our merchants grow their business. If they’re successful, we’re successful.

With that in mind, I feel that by giving online merchants the option to accept Bitcoins as payment for goods and services will allow them to attract new shoppers looking to use Bitcoins to buy products online.

BM: What makes your product stand out in comparison to other products/businesses utilizing Bitcoin?  

3dcart: 3dcart merchants have two options.

Merchants can get paid in USD if they do not want to manage Bitcoins themselves, and BitPay guarantees the exchange rate and manages the currency exchange when required.

Merchants can also opt to keep the Bitcoins they receive and manage them directly using a Bitcoin wallet.

By giving merchants the option, we aim to attract the masses, not just those familiar with Bitcoins/Bitcoin management.

BM: What are your suggestions for businesses hoping to embrace the Bitcoin currency like you have?  

3dcart: Learn as much as you can about Bitcoins so you can make an informed decision on whether or not this technology is right for your business.

July In Review

When writing the month’s review one month ago, I had turned cautiously pessimistic about the future of Bitcoin. The price had tumbled by 40%, media attention was dwindling, and regulatory agencies were beginning to come against Bitcoin in full force. Now, however, the situation has changed. The price has recovered, to the point of even breaking a major downward trend, the graph of attention on Bitcoin has changed from a decline to a plateau, and on the regulatory front Bitcoin businesses are fighting back, both in the United States and the European Union. Businesses are continuing to develop and emerge, and the in-person Bitcoin economy, consisting of meetups and Satoshi Square events, is booming. Of course, it is far too early to say that we are free and clear; on the regulatory front, Bitcoin will be under attack for years, and merchant adoption is a challenge that will never go away. But the Bitcoin community has proven itself to be strong, and has plenty of resources and tools with which to face the challenges that the next few years will bring.

Yet Another Round of Business Adoption

  • Two off-campus housing developments officially approved by the Brigham Young University in Idaho began accepting bitcoins.
  • Predictious, a Bitcoin-based prediction market, opened its doors this month. Predictious is far from the first site that allows Bitcoin users to bet on real-world events, but it is the first to use a market system rather than the parimutuel betting employed by its predecessors; market systems are generally considered superior because, unlike parimutuel systems, the market price precisely reflects the sites’s users’ opinion of the chance that a given event will take place.
  • BIPS announced Danske Bitcoin, a service which allows those with credit cards and bank accounts based in Denmark to nearly instantly buy bitcoins with their smartphones.
  • Khan Academy, an organization that produces freely available ten-minute online lecture videos on topics ranging from math and computer science to economics, started accepting Bitcoin donations. Bitcoin100, an organization dedicated to promoting Bitcoin adoption among charities by donating to major charities that start taking Bitcoin, promptly threw in $1000 in BTC
  • BlueVPN, a “virtual private network” service that helps users protect the privacy of their internet connections, started accepting Bitcoin.
  • The Nikkei MJ newspaper ran a front-page article about the first restaurant in Japan to accept Bitcoin. Japan is best known in the Bitcoin world for being the home of the leading Bitcoin exchange MtGox.
  • BitPay‘s Tony Gallippi announced that the company has processed a transaction volume of $7 million, 35% higher than in March. The company also announced a partnership with the popular online e-commerce platform 3dcart, allowing sixteen thousand merchants the chance to accept Bitcoin through BitPay without any technical effort beyond selecting the option and specifying their bank details.

Don’t Forget the Charities!

  • The BitGive Foundation, a nonprofit started by Connie Gallippi (sister of BitPay’s Tony Gallippi) with the aim of donating to environmental and public health causes around the world, announced its launch at the Inside Bitcoins Conference.
  • Coinforest launched a Bitcoin-based group buying website, offering its users large discounts on daily deals.
  • The Liberal Alliance, a classical-liberal leaning party in Denmark, became the first national party worldwide with seats in parliament to accept bitcoins.
  • Sean’s Outpost, a Bitcoin-accepting homeless shelter in Florida, announced that it had produced 13,000 meals for the homeless paid for with Bitcoin donations.

Government Says Ping, Bitcoin Says Pong

  • The United States’ Security Exchange Commission filed charges against Trendon Shavers, the mastermind of the $5 million Bitcoin Savings and Trust ponzi scheme after nearly a year of investigation. An initial defense that the scheme was not under the SEC’s jurisdiction because Bitcoin is not money failed spectacularly in court.
  • The Bank of Cyprus and its creditors reached an agreement that will stabilize the bank’s finances, at the cost of seizing 47.5% of all deposits at the bank exceeding 100,000 EUR per person. 37.5% had already been seized in April with another 22.5% provisionally frozen to pay for potential emergencies; under this deal, the additional 10% will be taken from the frozen funds and the remaining 12.5% unfrozen and returned to its owners.
  • Freedom Hosting, a web hosting service used by nearly half of al major hidden services on the Tor network, was shut down by Irish authorities, and its owner arrested and awaiting possible extradition to the United States.
  • Germany’s largest Bitcoin exchange Bitcoin.de, announced that it has reached a deal with Fidor Bank with which Bitcoin.de users’ fiat currency balances would be, optionally, converted into fully fledged FidorPay bank accounts. These bank accounts can be deposited to, withdrawn from and used to store money just like any other bank account, but at the same time will soon offer nearly instant Bitcoin trading through bitcoin.de’s interface.
  • A group of Bitcoin business owners and others in the digital currency field including Hub Culture’s Stan Stalnaker announced that creation of DATA (“Digital Asset Transfer Authority“), a self-regulatory body for Bitcoin and digital asset-related businesses.

Bitcoin Around the World

  • The Bitcoin community in Berlin organized a successful Bitcoin meetup with dozens of people attending.
  • The Inside Bitcoins Conference took place in New York, attracting attention from Bitcoin users from around the world, venture capitalists and many others.
  • The Bitcoin community grew massively in Argentina, with Bitcoin downloads rising by a factor of three compared to June and the local meetup boasting over 180 attendees.
  • CoinAva, the first Iranian website dedicated to Bitcoin, opened to the public, soon followed by Poolfa.
  • A group of Bitcoin users in Montreal announced their plan to create the Montreal Bitcoin Embassy, a physical location that would serve as a permanent Bitcoin hub for the city.

The Technical Side

  • Leading Bitcoin exchange MtGox announced that it has started using the Akamai computing network to host its services, allowing the exchange to serve users from thousands of servers around the world.
  • Lead Bitcoin protocol developer Gavin Andresen proposed Bitcoin wallets with two-factor authentication, using two-of-two multisignature transactions between the user and a centralized service.
  • Gavin also announced a payment message protocol, to be added into bitcoind starting from version 0.9. The protocol would allow online merchants to initiate payment requests that would need to be confirmed by customers, with the intent of increasing the convenience and security of online Bitcoin transactions.
  • Sunny King released Primecoin, the first cryptocurrency whose mining algorithm is intended to perform a useful function in addition to serving as the proof-of-work to prevent 51% attacks. The function: discovering long Cunningham chains of prime numbers. Three days later, Primecoin had an exchange and gambling site accepting it and had already broken two world records for the length-9 Cunningham chains with the largest first prime.
  • A number of alternative cryptocurrency-specific websites sprung up in the past month to cope with the spike in public interest in the currencies.

Let’s hope for more great Bitcoin news in August and September

Poolfa.com: Evidence of an Expanding Iranian Bitcoin Community

Bitcoin continues to grow in prominence and expand even in some of the most restricted nations in the world. Bitcoin Magazine just recently learned of Poolfa.com. Poolfa serves as the first BTC/altcoin-specific Persian website. Bitcoin communities around the world are seeking to not only translate Bitcoin news and information sites into different languages but also draw coherent connections between the benefits of Bitcoin and the needs of their society.

Poolfa is a multipurpose site with the aim of educating Iranians on the merits of BTC, dispensing Bitcoin related news, and providing a Bitcoin and Litecoin P2pool for site visitors. From an information angle, Poolfa is developing the first Persian Bitcoin Wiki. To foster discussion among members of the Bitcoin community in Iran, the Poolfa team has also launched a Bitcoin forum similar to the Bitcoin Forum run by bitcointalk.org. Poolfa’s Bitcoin forum provides tutorials on how to navigate the Bitcoin space and even Bitcoin exchange opportunities.

As knowledge is power, Poolfa administrators have taken steps to translate the first resources and letters on Bitcoin for Iranian citizens. Poolfa served as the first website in Iran to translate Satoshi Nakamoto’s first paper and release on the Bitcoin currency into Persian. Poolfa also offers The Bitcoin Beginner’s Guide in Persian.

While the Poolfa team continues to cover Bitcoin related news and developments for the Iranian community, this expanding organization plans to cover emerging virtual currencies in Iran. As societies around the world will begin transition to use digital currencies, Poolfa has taken steps to educate Iranians on the various currency options. Currently, Bitcoin is taking the lead, but Poolfa also exposes readers to Litecoin and other cryptocurrencies. As Bitcoin has proven to be an asset to Iranians whose rial is suffering from high inflation and an oppressive government, it will be interesting to see how successful additional alternative cryptocurrencies fare in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Through serving the Iranian people as a news blog, forum, wiki page, pool for mining, exchange and translation service, Poolfa is in turn contributing to the Bitcoin community as a whole. With an expanded and empowered user base, Bitcoin will continue to grow in prominence in Iran, the Middle East, and the rest of the world. Bitcoin Magazine thanks Poolfa for taking tangible steps to forge the trail for the Bitcoin community in Iran.

CoinTerra Announces Partnership with Open-Silicon

Cointerra

On August 5, 2013, CoinTerra, announced its selection of Open-Silicon as their ASIC design and development partner. As a semiconductor engineering company, CoinTerra, seeks Bitcoin mining solutions through using ASICs. With a team of design experts, CoinTerra seeks to produce high quality chips for power-efficient, low-cost, high-performance custom Bitcoin mining solutions.

Leading members of the Bitcoin community have taken to CoinTerra and are choosing to invest.  Economist and author of MacroTrends, Tuur Demeester stated, “CoinTerra is my first angel investment in the Bitcoin sphere.” Demeester also expressed that CoinTerra has longterm potential and opportunity for growth: “In the rapidly expanding Bitcoin ecosphere it’s not that difficult to find an investment that will yield you a return on your dollars invested. It is a much greater challenge however, to find an investment that will allow you to make a gain expressed in Bitcoin. That is why I’m keen on investing in the Bitcoin mining sector, which currently has a turnover of 1.3 million bitcoins annually. In the mining sector, CoinTerra struck me as having the strongest team and the greatest long term potential.”

The CoinTerra team issued the following press release:

CoinTerra selects Open-Silicon for next generation BitCoin ASICs

Aug 5th, 2013

Austin, TX. – CoinTerra, a company leading the next wave of silicon-based BitCoin mining, today announced that it has selected Open-Silicon as their ASIC design and development partner.  Selecting Open-Silicon paves the way forward to building the highest-performing hashing ASICs available in the market, which consume only a fraction of the power consumed by other mining ASICs.

CoinTerra’s world-class expertise in ASIC architecture combined with Open-Silicon’s track record in ASIC solutions – including design and manufacturing – is a dynamic blend, which will soon result in bringing the most advanced bitcoin mining products to market.  

“We selected Open-Silicon because they bring years of experience in getting working silicon to market” said Ravi Iyengar, CEO of CoinTerra Inc.  “When you are designing ASICs at the 2Xnm node and below, you need a partner like Open-Silicon who has completed over 300 ASIC solutions, shipped more than 75 million ASICs, and has an outstanding track record of meeting their committed schedules on time.”

“Our expertise and years of experience are well aligned with CoinTerra’s technical needs,” said Dr. Naveed Sherwani, President & CEO of Open-Silicon, Inc.  “It is great to work with a company that understands its market and thinks far ahead about its needs and requirements in order to achieve both short-term and long-term goals, ” said Dr. Sherwani.  

About CoinTerra
CoinTerra is a world-class semiconductor engineering company which designs and produces state-of-the-art Bitcoin ASIC processors and systems. CoinTerra’s superior design methodologies, advanced architectures, economies of scale and vertical integration enable them to deliver Bitcoin mining solutions with the highest performance ASICs for the lowest power and die area. CoinTerra’s mission is to become a reliable and trusted node for transaction clearing on a stable and flourishing Bitcoin network. For more information, visit CoinTerra’s website at http://www.cointerra.com.

About Open-Silicon

Open-Silicon, a leading supplier and developer of customer-specific products (CSPs), provides ASICs, platforms, concept-to-parts development, customized IP, low-effort derivative design, and state-of-the-art manufacturing solutions.  With Open-Silicon, customer’s benefit from global engineering including an ARM® Technology Center of Excellence, advanced SerDes integration, 2.5D interposer-based package engineering, experienced architects, leading-edge physical design methodology, and embedded software development, all leveraging the industry’s best technology from both Open-Silicon and the open market. For more information, visit Open-Silicon’s website at http://www.open-silicon.com or call 408-240-5700.

Bitcoin Magazine thanks the CoinTerra team for the advancements they are making in the Bitcoin community.

BYU Idaho Accepts Bitcoin in Select Student Housing Developments

Two Brigham Young University-Idaho off-campus housing developments recently announced they will allow residents to pay for rent with Bitcoin. EdgeCreek Property Management, which provides BYU-Idaho approved housing, is accepting Bitcoin in both the Nauvoo House for Men and the Mountain Pines Apartments for Women. This is a huge step forward for cryptocurrency, especially Bitcoin. Although someone can pay bills with Bitcoin using services like BillPayForCoins, the recent news at BYU-Idaho will bring the ease of use and practicality of accepting Bitcoin to the forefront.

 

There are a few other housing developments throughout the nation that accept Bitcoin or other crypto-currencies. For instance, Village on the Parkway in Orem, UT also accepts Bitcoin as payment for living costs. The Nauvoo House and Mountain Pines Apartments, however, are the first university approved housing developments to accept Bitcoin. These developments include room and all utilities for one price per semester with an option of bundling multiple semesters for a reduced cost. Every resident could obtain Bitcoin, set up a wallet, and send payment to the property manager in very little time. On the other side, the property manager sets up a wallet or merchant account with a payment processor such as BitPay, sends an invoice to the resident, and then receives payment. These methods provide both parties with a simple and secure transaction.

 

What does this mean for the future?

 

This development is an extremely positive step for the Bitcoin community. There is excitement in a wider acceptance, but it will depend on how many residents adopt the payment method. Many young professionals (age 19-25) have adopted cryptocurrency and support continues to increase. Many of these individuals are students at universities around the world who adopt new technologies very early. Whether that is housing, electricity, or a cheeseburger from your favorite downtown burger joint, Bitcoin could help college communities by providing a secure method of payment for any good or service. Imagine paying for your books, housing, and tuition at the college of your choice without having to reach in your “physical” wallet.

The recent news at BYU-Idaho is a huge leap forward for the Bitcoin community. By being the first university approved housing to accept Bitcoin, the Nauvoo House and Mountain Pines Apartments are forging a path for others to follow. There is no telling how quickly it will be adopted by residents but it is a sign of great progress. These are exciting times for cryptocurrency and time will show us how Bitcoin will be affected by this mainstream adoption.

“Bitcoin and the Future of Money”: October 2013 CryptoCurrency Conference

On October 5, Atlanta, GA will host the 2013 CrytoCurrency Conference.  Entitled, “Bitcoin and the Future of Money,” the conference aims at featuring the four year anniversary of Bitcoin’s launch in October of 2009. The conference team posted the following press release.

Atlanta to Host CryptoCurrency Conference

“Bitcoin and The Future of Money”

Atlanta, GA, July 24, 2013 — Nearly four years ago, a protocol for a new Internet money posted its first exchange rate to the dollar. It was a small fraction of one penny. The date was October 5, 2009. It was the date that Bitcoin went from being a mere abstraction, posted pseudonymously on a forum, to become the combination money and payment system that is rocking the world today.

In these four short years, a large infrastructure of global businesses have been built up around Bitcoin. It is used for global payment processing, casual exchange of debts, donations to nonprofits, online gaming, and a form of savings and spending among young, computer-savvy students. It is playing an increasingly important role as safe haven in countries with unstable currencies.

To commemorate this date, and to explore the economic and political implications of this pure, market-based base monetary order, experts from academia, journalism, investing, and industry will gather October 5, 2013, in Atlanta, Georgia, to present their analyses and outlooks for the future. The venue is The Twelve in Atlantic Station.

The conference is “Bitcoin and the Future of Money” run under the auspices of the CryptoCurrency Conference.

The opening reception on Friday night October 4, is being sponsored by the Atlanta-based Bitcoin processing startup BitPay. All attendees are invited to tour BitPay’s offices and learn about the business of Bitcoin.

This is the first large-scale Bitcoin conference in the Southeast of the United States. The URL for details and registration is: CryptoCurrencyCon.com. The conference is being co-sponsored by the Foundation for Economic Education, Bitcoin Magazine, BitPay, and Let’s Talk Bitcoin.

The speakers include:

Tony Gallippi (CEO, BitPay)

Stephen Pair (CTO, BitPay)

Jeffrey Tucker (Laissez Faire Books)

Stephan Kinsella (Houston, TX)

Doug French (Laissez Faire Club)

Michael Goldstein (The Mises Circle at UT-Austin)

Peter Surda (Vienna, Austria)

Cathy Reisenwitz (Sex and the State)

Charles Hoskinson (Bitcoin Education Project)

Daniel Larimer (Bitcoin Education Project)

Adam B. Levine (Let’s Talk Bitcoin)

Tuur Demeester (MacroTrends)

Daniel Krawisz (The Mises Circle at UT-Austin)

The panels and speeches will deal with all the critical topics in the world of cryptocurency.

How much will Bitcoin grow over the next four years? How far will its reach extend? What does its invention and successful use imply for the theory and practice of money and banking?

What are the investment implications? What does Bitcoin do to the presumption that money must be the exclusive province of the political order? And, more fundamentally, what makes Bitcoin work at all?

This currency is a unique creation of the Internet and it has features completely unlike existing government monies and existing systems of credit-card processing.

Its ledger lives on distributed servers.

It is exchanged peer to peer.

The source code is completely open.

Payments are processed using public-key cryptography.

At the same time, Bitcoin itself conforms with the properties of money with academic precision, which accounts for its value. Pulling all these points together, and exploring the implications for economic growth, is the driving goal of this conference.

“Whether you are new to the Bitcoin world or a savvy code monkey who has been mining for years, this conference invites you into a compelling conversation,” says the Conference website. “It is one that we must have and cannot avoid. We are fortunate to be alive to see this happening in our time, and now is the time to learn, to celebrate, and collaborate.”

Friday night’s reception will be at BitPay in the Atlanta Tech Village. The venue for the Saturday event is The Twelve, a wonderful, post-industrial hotel and conference center in Atlantic Station. The contact email for the conference is cryptocurrencycon@gmail.com. The Facebook page is facebook.com/CryptoCurrencyCon.

We look forward to seeing you on October 5th at our Bitcoin Magazine booth!

New Liberty Dollar Silver QR Coin Obtains Live Bitcoin Prices

Left: “Cognitare Extra Buxum” / “Think Outside of the Box”     

Right:  “Veritas Vos Liberabit” / “The Truth Will Set You Free” 

 

Joseph Vaughn Perling

Joseph Vaughn Perling, the issuer of the New Liberty Dollar (not to be confused with Bernard von NotHaus’s NORFED Liberty Dollar) and regular Bitcoin Forum contributor announced during his speech on “Free Money” at OHM2013: Observe. Hack. Make conference on July 31st in the Netherlands that he will be issuing a new private minting of “anonymous” QR enabled silver medallions.

 Vaughn Perling had the courage to issue The New Liberty Dollar with a strikingly similar appearance to that of the NORFED Liberty Dollar while von NotHaus was awaiting sentencing on counterfeiting and fraud charges. However, Vaughn Perling added a disclaimer to his website that the purchaser acknowledges that The New Liberty Dollar is a “silver piece medallion, and not any government issued coin.”  Some might, for simplicity’s sake, refer to Vaughn Perling’s medallion as a “coin,” as I have done in the title of this article;  I have previously discussed the delineation of a coin and a medallion in the eCommerceBytes article ”Not Just Semantics: Amazon Coin Is Not a Coin.”

The new QR engraved medallions enable a user of the coin to obtain real-time “manufacturer’s suggested trade value” which is based on the silver spot market price plus “standard premium.” The price will be in Bitcoin as well as other crypto and national currencies.  

Vaughn Perling is keenly aware that a number of Bitcoiners have found themselves interested in the cryptocurrency because silver and Bitcoin enthusiasts often travel in the same circles. Said another way, silver stacking is often the “gateway drug” for Bitcoin adoption. Perhaps Max Keiser is the most publicly spoken silver advocate for Bitcoin (for what it’s worth, here is Max Keiser’s first website entry on Bitcoin from  December 2010). Because of Vaughn Perling’s Silver/Bitcoin awareness and “a promise he made to Satoshi Nakamoto eight years ago,” live BTC conversion rates are one of many currency options linked to the QR code.

I spoke with Vaughn Perling who explained how this medallion is different than that of the single use, disposable cold storage technologies out there today:

“…These wallets are by nature one-time use. This is so possession is required for redemption, and to verify that they have not been redeemed and still hold their value. There is also a required trust in the issuer and so there are some security issues around that.”

Vaughn Perling is an admirer of the  the Casascius crypto-coin, the new Lealana Physical Silver Litecoins, as well as the upcoming physical Litecoins by the Litecoin Foundation (Goat, Chaang-Noi’s team).

Vaughn Perling explains, “as a medium of exchange, {current cold storage concepts} do not live up to the promise of good money as measured through the expanse of time and into the future.”

“Metals, glue, and holographic film used in cold storage until now have physical properties which respond differently to environments. They may be hot or cold or wet or dry, and for a pocket piece suitable for carrying daily, this is not suitable.”

This new minting is a return to durable and persistent money that can be used as a store of value.

I asked Vaughn Perling about the evolution of this concept and where it might be headed. Would it be possible in the future to embed an LCD in the medallion with a lithium battery compartment?

“In order to maintain the integrity of the piece, it ought to be a uniform substance. We struggled with a lot of different ideas, and the QR was the result. We had this answer a few years back, but the market wasn’t ready. Now with the Bitcoin constituency (who are all very familiar with QR codes) the market is ready. The percentage of people using QR codes for anything is still very small, but the percentage of Bitcoin people using it approaches 100%.”

The Royal Dutch Mint was the first to embed a QR Code into a coin back in 2011 but the new Quarter Bitcoin will be the first to track the value of the coin itself.

The new minting will be as anonymous as U.S. Coins issued by the U.S. mint which unlike Federal Reserve Notes, do not have serial numbers engraved on them.

Vaughn Perling further explains:

“The embedded cryptography of cold storage cryptocurrencies until now has made each piece unique and therefore traceable, just as the serial numbers on most fiat currencies [are] traceable….I sought to make something more flexible. It should be capable of anonymity…just as the change in your pocket is more anonymous than the paper money in your wallet, this is a characteristic of coinage that I sought to maintain in the pieces I would create…I also sought to design a piece that would support not just Bitcoin, but any crypto-currency successor to Bitcoin.”

Each coin will be engraved “one ounce silver ‘Quarter Bitcoin’” in case of an existential EMP threat (my words not Vaughn Perling’s) or perhaps something less sinister…to facilitate trade in internet dead zones in remote areas.

While Vaughn Perling did not want to refer to the nominal engraved value as a fiat value (latin phrase for “let it be done” / “it shall be”) he is certainly “cognitare extra buxum” pegging .25 BTC “nominal value” to the medallion. I’m not completely comfortable making a comparison between cold storage and the QR coin but Vaughn Perling has brought awareness that cold storage is still in its infancy and I’m looking forward to cold storage 2.0.

Look for the coin for sale soon. I’m looking forward to acquiring a piece myself.

TIME TO RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION!

Clear Mag Logo

Bitcoin Magazine would like to thank you for first visiting our news site, for taking a look at our print magazines and for many, ordering a subscription to Bitcoin Magazine. Since we first released our first print magazine issue, the Bitcoin currency has grown to a significant level of prominence.  Bitcoin Magazine has now released 12 issues.  That means that for several of you, it is time to renew your subscription.

While you can order individual issues, we encourage you to take up the opportunity TODAY to renew your subscription in full for another year OR start up a subscription TODAY!

As the Bitcoin currency continues to flourish and as digital currencies become the norm, you will want to regularly receive your copy of Bitcoin Magazine.

As we continue into Bitcoin Magazine’s second year, we have expanded to now have a digital edition and have welcomed and continue to welcome some new writers to the team!

We plan to keep you informed on the latest news in the Bitcoin community and provide more in depth articles on this fascinating digital, decentralized cryptocurrency through a monthly tangible copy of Bitcoin Magazine!

If you have any questions about the current status of your subscription, please contact us at help@bitcoinmagazine.com.
We look forward to signing you up for a full year subscription to Bitcoin Magazine!

Freedom Hosting Taken Down, Founder Arrested, Users fed Javascript Exploits

Freedom Hosting, a web hosting provider specifically targeting websites in the Tor community, has been shut down, and its owner Eric Eoin Marques arrested in Ireland on charges of facilitating the distribution of online child pornography. Marques is now sitting in jail, denied bail while the Irish courts determine the validity of an extradition request by the United States. Freedom Hosting was responsible for a large number of major “hidden services” on the Tor network, most notably including the email provider Tormail, and some estimates suggest that up to half of all major Tor hidden services relied on it for hosting. However, the site has also long been known as a hotbed of child pornography; in 2011, Operation Darknet, an anti-child-pornography subgroup of Anonymous, sent a warning to Freedom Hosting asking the service to remove all CP-hosting websites. When Freedom Hosting refused, Anonymous launched an all-out attack, hacking into Freedom Hosting’s servers and shutting down all sites two and a half hours later. Now, the US and Irish governments have taken the provider down themselves – but using the much heavier weaponry of the legal system to do the job.

When US and Irish law enforcement took over Freedom Hosting’s servers, the sites were not simply taken down immediately. Rather, they let the sites keep operating for some time, and some extra Javascript code was injected into the sites’ webpages, to be automatically run by the browsers of users accessing the sites as part of loading the page. The code in question first checks whether the user is running Firefox 17, and if they are it then opens an iframe which loads an exploit from another site, which then takes advantage of a Firefox 17 vulnerability for purposes the precise details of which are not yet known. At this point, the most common hypothesis is that the exploit makes an HTTP request bypassing the Tor protection, revealing the user’s IP address to the authorities.

This event is a serious blow to the Tor darknet, but provides some valuable lessons to members of this fledgling underground community and, largely thanks to Bitcoin, economy. First, just like in the normal economy, centralization poses serious risks. If, rather than one hosting provider having 50% market share, the economy was split among multiple competing services, not only would each invididual shutdown be less disruptive to the Tor community, but there would also be less incentive to attack each one in the first place. With Tormail and email providers there is a parallel situation. Second, personal responsibility and control are paramount. The Tor ecosystem has no legal framework to encourage service providers to remain honest – in fact, the legal framework of the outside world often, as in this case, does the exact opposite. Thus, Tor users must work to put less trust in third parties, and keep more control in the hands of the only person they truly can trust: themselves.

In practice, this means two things: decentralization and encryption. Tor users should spend more time looking into decentralized alternatives like peer-to-peer file sharing, Bitmessage and Osiris, and try to avoid centralized services unless they provide genuine value that decentralized alternatives cannot replace. Ideally, a decentralized alternative would emerge to markets like Silk Road and Atlantis as well. As for encryption, PGP is the most widely-used form of public-key encryption today, allowing users to securely send encrypted messages to each other that no one can read without the private key. With the help of PGP, even centralized services like Tormail and Silk Road can be made fairly secure. With the capture of Tormail, every message ever written over Tormail is now potentially in the US government’s hands. Even without the interference of any government, Tormail’s operator has always had the power to do whatever they wanted with its users’ messages – including selling the data, using it to blackmail users, or even modifying messages in transit to fraudulently organize meetings and business deals. Those Tormail users who use PGP, however, are completely safe.

One conclusion that some would draw is that Tor hidden service operators should be self-hosting their sites. However, self-hosting is a complex and nuanced issue in the world of Tor. On the one hand, just like any other centralized service hosting providers can be shut down or betray their customers. On the other hand, self-hosting hidden services locally is a very difficult task. If done wrong, depending on the site’s function it potentially opens one up to detection, shutdown and even arrest, and having the job of hosting done by experts essentially eliminates this risk – even now, the operators of most of the sites compromised by Freedom Hosting’s shutdown are likely still anonymous. The best solution may be a combination of having more hosting providers, having some hosting providers operating out in the open in data-friendly jurisdictions like Iceland, and more self-hosting where necessary.

Finally, the event reminds us that Javascript injection is a serious problem, and one that Bitcoin users particularly need to be wary of. This time, the exploit potentially reveals your IP address to police. Next time, it might be a Tor-based “secure” online wallet provider inserting some Javascript to send all your money to 1USgoV. The DEA has already shown themselves capable of seizing bitcoins through some unspecified mechanism (likely setting up a fake seller account and fraudulently selling “drugs” with it), so seizing bitcoins with a Javascript injection attack is not much of a further step. All applications relying on Javascript browser cryptography should exist in the form of Chrome and Firefox extensions and not just websites; the most popular online wallet, blockchain.info, has done this for months.

Hopefully, the Tor community will pick itself up from this attack, and services will grow to replace Freedom Hosting and Tormail (although Freedom Hosting’s replacement might want to filter child porn out). The crypto-economy is not just useful for drugs; for the wider society as a whole, it is an economic playground which lacks much of the basic infrastructure that those of us in the outside world take for granted is simply absent, and users are left to figure out for themselves how markets and cooperation can thrive. Most of the experiments that take place there will certainly sputter and fail; others, however, can be the start of something great. Bitcoin itself might be an example; the Tor community and Silk Road were arguably the currency’s first major committed user base in 2011 and 2012, and if it weren’t for them the development of more ordinary applications for Bitcoin like international money transfer and retail might be months further behind today. Economists can analyze crypto-markets and see how communities respond to the presence and absence of fraud prevention, regulation and higher-level infrsatructure in a whole new light. TorBroker and Torwallet are both great examples of this playing out in practice. Ultimately, this takedown too will prove to be a very interesting stress test as we watch just how the community recovers in the weeks and months ahead.

The Bitcoin Gambling Diaspora

Over one year ago, the launch of Erik Voorhees’ SatoshiDice marked the moment that Bitcoin gambling took its first major step into the mainstream. The site offered a level of convenience unmatched by any Bitcoin gambling site – indeed, any online gambling site regardless of payment method, in history: users send money to a Bitcoin address, and if they win they immediately get more money back. The site was an instant hit, rapidly growing to such a point that roughly 50% of all transactions on the Bitcoin network were to or from its addresses. By the beginning of 2013, the site was earning over $300,000 per month, and even as the price of Bitcoin began its meteoric rise at the start of the year the value of the site’s BTC-denominated shares barely budged.

Now, however, Bitcoin gambling is growing to be much more than just SatoshiDice. Of couse, many old-time gambling sites like BitZino and Seals with Clubs have been providing alternatives to SatoshiDice all along, but in the opening months of 2013 the massive success of Erik Voorhees’ juggernaut has prompted dozens of people to come up with alternatives. We now have the roulette-style wheel games SatoshiCircle and most recently BitcoinSpin, the minefield Satoshi Karoshi, the SatoshiDice clone SuzukiDice offering half the fees of the original, and the lottery BitMillions, and new sites are opening practically every week. What is more interesting than just the number of sites, however, is that so many of these second-tier gambling sites are seeing large amounts of bets and attention – such large amounts, in fact, that it may no longer be appropriate to call them second tier.

Case Study: JustDice

JustDice is a gambling site that first opened in June 2013, offering a form of gameplay similar to SatoshiDice, but using a more traditional deposit and withdraw system instead of requiring users to make a transaction for each bet. Some find SatoshiDice’s “transactions are bets” approach highly convenient, but it is not for everyone; some dislike it because they want to make many bets at a time and sending a transaction each time is actually less efficient than clicking a button (both in time spent and transaction fees), and others criticize it for its impact on the Bitcoin system as a whole – specifically, for “polluting” the blockchain. SatoshiDice’s addresses are currently responsible for roughly a quarter of all transactions that have ever taken place, adding over two gigabytes to the amount of storage space that every fully participating Bitcoin node needs to operate. JustDice, on the other hand, contributes to blockchain bloat only when users deposit and withdraw. Finally, JustDice also seeks to outcompete SatoshiDice on the house edge: while SatoshiDice takes an average of 1.9% from all bets as profit, JustDice is calibrated to take 1%, making gambling on JustDice twice as cheap.

To play JustDice, you only need to click “Deposit” to get a Bitcoin address to deposit money, send the funds and wait 1 confirmation (usually 0-15 minutes) for the funds to be credited into one’s account. From there you are free to make bets as often as desired. There is a field which allows users set the exact bet amount and winning percentage that they want, and clicking a button is all it takes to make a bet. Withdrawing is equally as simple: just click the Withdraw button, enter and amount and Bitcoin address, and you’re done. But JustDice also has another feature up its sleeve, and one that no other site before it has implemented nearly as elegantly: on-site investing. When you deposit to JustDice, you have the option of adding a portion of your funds to the bankroll, allowing the site to use it to pay out unexpected very large wins if necessary. The more investors the site has, the higher it can safely raise its maximum bet, allowing it to earn greater profits. In exchange, you get a proportional share of whatever profits the site makes – although there is a risk, as if the site loses money you lose too. To cash out your earnings, simply click withdraw and you’re done. No BitFunder shares or stock trading required.

JustDice has proven to be highly successful, earning over 2800 BTC of profit after little over less than two months of operation – roughly half the earnings of SatoshiDice, and the site has already seen over forty million bets – far more than SatoshiDice, although the fact that JustDice is optimized for making a large number of bets one after the other does mean that this is not a very fair comparison. With 40,000 BTC invested, JustDice’s market capitalization currently stands at roughly one third of that of SatoshiDice when the site sold itself earlier in July.

Case Study: SatoshiCircle

SatoshiCircle is a roulette-style wheel game first launched in March 2013 by a team of developers based in Toronto, Canada. The gameplay of SatoshiCircle is simple. When you go to the site for the first time, you are redirected to a personal URL that serves as the key to your account. You can deposit bitcoins to your account by sending money to your personal deposit address, and SatoshiCircle even provides a QR code to make the process easier for players with mobile wallets. The money arrives instantly (for security, it’s the withdrawals that require 2 confirmations). Once you have money in your account, you can then select the amount that you want to bet and click “Spin”. Five seconds later, the spinner stops and depending on where the spinner lands you receive either none, 25%, 150%, 200% or 300% of the money you bet. Withdrawing is simple – just click “Withdraw Bitcoins” from the menu at the top of the screen, and you will see a form where you can either click on a Bitcoin address you used to deposit to the site, or enter your own. And that’s all there is to it.

Where SatoshiCircle particularly distinguishes itself, however, is in its bells and whistles. “The idea,” the site’s founder explains, “was for a very clean-looking, easy to play, interactive game, which was lacking in the Bitcoin community. There was no gameplay in SatoshiDice, and we wanted to make it interesting and exciting.” Every time you make a bet, in addition to winning and losing bitcoins you also earn a certain number of points. Points can also be earned for making streaks, such as getting nine winning spins in a row. As soon as you reach a certain threshold of points, you unlock additional features such as alternative spinning wheels. One bonus wheel, for example, is essentially a coin flip between getting double one’s bet and losing it, with one small sliver returning .7x to provide the 1.76% house edge, and another wheel offers a 15x jackpot. Whenever you receive a particularly large win on any of the wheels, a congratulatory graphic depending on which wheel the bet was made on appears on screen – themed penguins on the default wheel, flying UFOs on another; play the game yourself to find out the rest! Aside from the bonus wheels, points have other applications; there are monthly Bitcoin draws based on reward points as well as global leaderboards to show who has the most points. Finally, and perhaps most importantly of all, SatoshiCircle actually has sound effects.

The site started earning a profit as soon as it launched, earning roughly 20 BTC its first week and then increasing to 50 BTC during the second week – a rate which the site has kept up ever since, now boasting total cumulative earnings of over 700 BTC since its launch. The site began growing exponentially at the beginning of May, but the growth was unfortunately stunted when both the Bitcoin price chart site ClarkMoody and Reddit stopped accepting gambling sites (Reddit has always had a policy prohibiting them; the site simply stepped up its vigilance in enforcing the ban). Fortunately, SatoshiCircle retained many of its initial customers, and recently its revenue has even begun picking up once again. Last week, SatoshiCircle passed SatoshiDice in the total number of bets made – despite the fact that the site has only been around a quarter as long as its competitor (although, like JustDice, the comparison is not quite fair because SatoshiCircle’s deposit mechanism is better suited for a large number of bets one after the other, while SatoshiDice’s design targets fewer and larger bets). Today, the site is continuing to grow quickly, seeing 15 new players and 120,000 spins (from new and old players combined) every day.

The company has plans to expand into the virtual slot machine industry as well with “Satoshi Sevens”, a slot machine game including a feature known as a “progressive jackpot”. A portion of all house commissions will go into a special pool, and anyone who wins the best possible result in the game with the maximum bet of 0.01 BTC will receive all of the funds accumulated in the pool. Those who win that result with a smaller bet will not get the jackpot, but will receive 250x their money back.

Listings and Directories

Because many countries’ laws, including those of the US, prohibit advertising gambling, the greatest challenge that gambling sites of all shapes and sizes face is that of making themselves known. Fortunately, the Bitcoin community has come up with some innovative solutions. Bitcointalk forum member Mem has created Mem’s Bitcoin Gambling List, a directory of gambling sites with nearly a hundred entries from categories ranging from lotteries to dice games to video poker. The list is particularly helpful because it includes a rating system, showing which sites have responsive admins, which have ongoing payout issues and which are outright scams.

The most interesting rating of all is “considered mathematically honest” – in other words, provably fair. Provable fairness is an innovation in the Bitcoin gambling industry which basically means that sites publicly release their algorithms as well as cryptographic commitments to the secret data used to power the random number generators determining which bets win and which bets lose. This ensures that if the site attempts to cheat, the fact will become obvious at the end of the day when the site is expected to reveal the secret data for the day. If the site cheated on any single bet, users can independently verify the outcome of the bet by running the random number generator with the no longer secret data themselves and notice the discrepancy, and if the site tries to change the underlying secret data after the fact the cryptographic commitment will reveal this as well. Thus, users can be sure that their chances of winning are exactly as advertised. Mem personally screens websites to verify their provable fairness, and at times even makes specific demands for sites to modify their interface or algorithms before giving them the coveted “considered mathematically honest” rating. His list is so highly regarded that gambling site operators usually comply.

Another site that will soon be making a more formal launch is betswithbitcoin.com, more traditional, ad-supported directory. A large portion of the site’s revenue will be donated to charity, and individual sites have the opportunity to raise the status of their listings by making charity donations as well. The site features a detailed description of over 60 different gambling sites, including the game rules, data such as the minimum and maximum bet and the average house rake (ie. the fee) and, of course, whether the game is provably fair.

Altogether, the Bitcoin gambling industry represents a shining example of what rapid internet-enabled innovation, coupled with the extreme malleability of a monetary technology like Bitcoin, can do. House rakes are low, with nearly all sites below 2% and some even below 1% compared to 5-50% in traditional online and offline casinos, and the invention of mathematically provable fairness has completely substituted the expensive certification processes and specialized hardware of the machines in Las Vegas. Higher-order services like quality control are independently provided by the community, and information on fraudulent sites is able to progress through the internet at lightning speeds. Although gambling is usually considered one of the more shady industries in modern economy, in the world of Bitcoin it is rather a powerful example of business done right.

Bitcoin Foundation Provides Additional Grant to Coinpunk Project

The Bitcoin community continues to flourish as new developments are made in the area of wallet security and open source web-based wallet services.  As Bitcoin grows in value and utility more users are interested in secure wallets.  Just yesterday, the Coinpunk Project released the following announcement of funding from the Bitcoin Foundation.

Coinpunk Project Press Release

08/02/13

Press Contact: press@coinpunk.org

Yesterday the Bitcoin Foundation announced that they are funding the development of the Coinpunk project. Coinpunk is a project led by veteran startup founder Kyle Drake to build an open source web-based wallet service that can be run by any user, by developers to build their own wallet service, or organizations wanting to run their own Bitcoin “credit unions”.

The announcement is part of the Foundation’s Q2 Grant Award, which is an ongoing effort to improve the open source ecosystem of Bitcoin by providing funding to help improve the tools available for people to work with Bitcoin. The first grants were for Q1, which included important funding for improvements to Bitcoin testing infrastructure.

“The main tenet of Bitcoin is that decentralization is what drives its soundness”, said Kyle. “But what we’ve seen recently is an ecosystem where web wallets are run by a few US/UK based players. That’s similar to the way GMail works for email, which isn’t a bad thing, but it’s not for everyone. If Bitcoin wants to maintain its goal of being decentralized, there needs to be a rich abundance of choices, and web wallet services need to be available to different organizations and countries.” Kyle added that it is the implications on banking that interests him the most. “Instead of having big banks and financial groups control your money, you get Bitcoin owners being their own banks, investing in only the things they want to invest in, and not being charged with mystery fees or being exposed to fraud and malinvestment of funds.”

Kyle noted there is currently a version of Coinpunk available, but that he’s currently in the process of building a major new version. “I’m providing the option to move the security from the server to the browser side, which makes the server less like a bank that holds your money, and more like a safety deposit box it can’t open, which increases trustability. I’m also focusing on building the tools developers need to make custom wallet services for solving specific problems or running exchanges in non-US countries with this technology.”

Kyle isn’t sure when the project will be finished, noting that he wants the project to be stable before releasing the new version, but hopes to have a release available by the end of late summer. “It’s a very ambitious project that’s going to affect a lot of people, and I want to make sure we get things right. We want to provide a rich set of options and developer tools, so we can enable a web wallet ecosystem for working with Bitcoin that hopefully becomes a strong community resource.”

The next grant deadline for Q3 proposals will be Friday, September 20th. Information on submitting grant proposals can be found on the Bitcoin Foundation blog.

Bitcoin Magazine had the privilege of interview Coinpunk veteran startup founder Kyle Drake.

kyledrake

Bitcoin Magazine : When did you first hear about and get involved in the Bitcoin currency?

Kyle Drake:I first heard about Bitcoin a few years ago, and it immediately made sense to me what it was trying to do, and I’ve been following it pretty closely ever since. I’ve always been fascinated by economics, and have spent a lot of time reading about the effects of commodity money, especially in edge cases (like how cigarettes are used in prisons as a currency, and sea shells were used in antiquity). These edge cases emphasize a natural way that humans tend to deal with resource problems in a microcosmic, decentralized way. Having that background allowed me to quickly realize that Bitcoin was going to be the replacement and improvement for a lot of centralized financial systems, and that got me interested.

The current Bitcoin climate reminds me a lot of the Homebrew Computer Club days in the 70s, when there were passionate idealists working on side projects that ended up creating the most culturally liberating technology in the world: the personal computer. And I see Bitcoin as a logical extension of that pioneering work: Banks are today’s mainframes, and Bitcoin is the financial version of the personal computer. Centralized, versus decentralized. Being a bank stops being this expensive thing only a few large corporations can do – it becomes something everybody can do.

Not everybody “gets” Bitcoin yet, just like people didn’t “got” personal computers back then, when it was mainly the purview of hackers like Steve Wozniak and idealistic visionaries like Stewart Brand. But I am seeing the potential of Bitcoin for the exact same reasons they had for the personal computer, and in time I think the profound nature of Bitcoin will be obvious to everyone. I think we’re on the ground floor of something very important here, and I want to help contribute to that.

In the United States, the mortgage crisis and the Occupy movement really brought the problems with our banking system to the forefront, and you had people finally starting to look at their banks, that were creating random fines and fees, investing poorly, kicking people out of their homes without giving them a fair chance, and say “I don’t agree with what you’re doing”. I see the opportunity for Bitcoin to help build a more ethical banking system, that gives customers more choice and control over their money, that isn’t filled with arbitrary fees and restrictions, and that deals with the massive fraud problem that our banking system has completely failed to address with credit cards and wire transfers.

BM: When did you first get the idea for Coinpunk and what inspired you to create the site?

KD: I’ve always been interested in the wallet side of the problem, because I see wallets as the natural evolution of a bank account.

I wanted to run my own Bitcoin wallet service, so I looked around for open source solutions and couldn’t find one. This was concerning, because I believed if there wasn’t a good open source option, it might lead to situation where all the wallets become centrally controlled by a few entities, which could bring us right back to many of the problems with our current banking system.

I’m not against commercial wallet services, I think they are good (and play a role similar to that of Google Mail for email). But we need open source alternatives, too, so that we improve upon Bitcoin’s biggest strength: decentralization. If email only worked through Google Mail and Hotmail, it wouldn’t be very good.

BM: Were there any preexisting businesses that inspired you to create Coinpunk?

KD: All of the current wallet services have been an inspiration of sorts, because I was able to see how they approached the problem, and distill that into something that I thought would work well for this project. There’s really nothing wrong with the existing wallet services, most of them are great. They’re just not fully open source, and are based in specific countries.

I wanted to make a project for people wanting to run and build their own wallet service, in the same light as projects like buttercoin (an open source Bitcoin exchange platform). I don’t see Coinpunk as competing with commercial wallet services. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if they find parts of the project useful for their work. Everybody’s helping each other out, and that’s a very positive thing for the Bitcoin ecosystem.

BM: Where do you see Coinpunk going in a year?

KD: Coinpunk is going to be a fully-featured wallet service, and I hope to see people start to use it to solve real-world problems.

I’m expecting to see a lot of usage in interesting ways, such as with hardware wallets like BitSafe (which Butterfly Labs is currently working on). I’m also very interested in seeing Coinpunk used in regional exchange and wallet services that help Bitcoin adoption in countries with bad currency problems (like Argentina). Bitcoin could really be a lifeboat for people in countries with high inflation rates like Argentina and Venezuela, and I hope Coinpunk gets to play a role there.

BM: What makes your new wallet stand out in comparison to other wallets for the Bitcoin currency?

KD: Coinpunk is the only fully open-source web wallet service available. That’s its main differentiation right now, but I expect that it will stand out in other ways in the future as we start adding more functionality.

BM: What are your suggestions for individuals hoping to start an open source project like yours?

KD: Just do it! The Bitcoin development community is very friendly, open and collaborative. There is a lot of support for people working on improving the ecosystem and protecting our legal rights with groups like the Bitcoin Foundation, and there’s a lot of important and interesting problems that need to be solved. This isn’t another stupid photo sharing app: We know we’re changing the world, and everybody is excited about it. It’s a lot of fun.

BM: If I am a merchant looking to sell through your site, how can I get started?

KD: Coinpunk might support some basic bitcoin-to-bitcoin purchase services in the future, and will have an API to help facilitate development, but I would strongly recommend using a merchant-specific service like BitPay for now. They have been spending a lot of time working on making it easy for people, are way more affordable (and less fraud prone) than credit cards, and can do conversions to your local currency for you automatically.

Coinforest: The Cheaper In Bitcoin Movement Takes Another Step Forward

One of the aspects of the modern consumer economy that Bitcoin users often miss out on is that of special deals, where customers can, whether through acquiring rewards points, gathering coupons or signing up for special programs, occasionally get select products at rock-bottom prices. Loyalty programs like Air Miles let people gather points and eventually receive goods like plane tickets at a heavily discounted prices or for free, some credit cards give 1-3% cash back to the customer (ultimately at the merchant’s expense), and programs like Groupon let customers go to select merchants and receive up to 75% off with no prior commitment. These kinds of programs serve a valuable role in the economy; sometimes, they are useful as marketing tools, giving everyone access to a small quantity of their product in order to spread the word about their business and give people a chance to see what they are about, at other times they are a form of price discrimination, giving discounts to people who cannot afford to pay as much, and finally they are often used by stores as a way of rapidly getting rid of a product that they have too much of in stock and want to sell.

In the Bitcoin economy, such deals are unfortunately hard to find. There are sites like the BitcoinStore and BTCTrip that sell things relatively cheaply, but the sort of heavy, twenty to eighty percent, discounts that traditional discount programs offer are simply not availbale. Fortunately, that is soon about to change. Coinforest is a new company that aims to provide a very specific kind of discount program, known as group buying, to the Bitcoin community, and has just opened its first deal today. Group buying is a system where a centralized service negotiates with a company to offer a large discount on a particular item if enough people are willing to buy it. The service then publicly announces the deal, and asks for anyone interested to sign up. If enough people sign up, the deal goes through, and customers are able to receive their product from the merchant at the low price; otherwise, everyone’s money is refunded.

Aside from the marketing and promotional aspect, group buying is good for merchants because it allows them to sell a product that requires mass production to efficiently produce without maintaining a large stock. The group buying arrangement gathers a large group of customers to buy a given product on the same day, allowing the producer to make all of the products at the same time and ship them off immediately. If there are not enough customers for economies of scale to kick in, the deal simply does not happen. For online services, the situation is similar, except the mass production process is replaced by expenses like hiring an additional employee for customer support or upgrading one’s servers; more important in those cases, however, is the marketing aspect.

Coinforest was originally founded by John Mardlin, an entrepreneur with a background in business development and marketing software-as-a-service products. The company itself is based in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, and the company’s business development manager Brandon Gains is also involved in several tech startups in the region. “We’re driven by our desire to grow the bitcoin economy,” Gains explains, “Bitcoin, and cryptocurrencies in general.” So far, there are plenty of people developing Bitcoin projects, but the number of people actually interested in buying bitcoins is still relatively small. Short term discounts, Gains believes, have the power to change that. “CoinForest can’t create a whole new product and then only sell it for BTC,” Gains adds, “but we can create a temporary situation, where the only way to get a certain item for a certain price is with bitcoin. Our ultimate goal is to be the reason that many people get their first bitcoins.”

Right now, Coinforest has one active deal with the Bitcoin T-shirt vendor shirtoshi.com, as well as many others which the company is not willing to disclose at this time. In general, Coinforest is targeting Bitcoin-related goods and services, 3D printing services, equipment for makers, online education, tools and services for building software and services for startups and online businesses. Coinforest’s pitch is that by offering a deal exclusively in Bitcoin the company is targeting a strong early-adopter community and a successful deal can be a great public relations opportunity for gathering media attention. For businesses, Coinforest also has another attraction: they can test the waters accepting Bitcoin without actually setting anything up. Coinforest collects the bitcoins themselves, and is willing to pay out merchants in fiat – saving businesses both the effort of integrating a new payment system and 2.9% credit card fees. If the deal proves successful, the business can integrate a proper Bitcoin payments platform, and have an array of Bitcoin customers already waiting for them.

In the future, Coinforest intends to continually expand their range of offerings and add new features; once the company is comfortable with the success of its business model, a built-in escrow system using BTCRow will be one of the first new features on the horizon. Gathering more businesses and better deals, however, is a higher priority for now.

Cheaper in Bitcoin

Coinforest is only part of a larger movement to get merchants to not just accept Bitcoin, but also to sell goods cheaper in Bitcoin. Some Bitcoin-only businesses, like BitcoinStore and BTCTrip, offer very favorable deals to Bitcoin users already, but the goal here is to convince even business owners that do not quite consider themselves Bitcoiners first and business owners second to do the same. That is to say, merchants should offer the same products to Bitcoin and fiat currency users, but specifically offer a price of, perhaps, $12.99 for fiat and $11.99 in BTC. There are several reasons to do that. First, when a business accepts Bitcoin for a transaction they do not have to worry about fraud, chargebacks or transaction fees (above 0.99% for BitPay if applicable or 0.0001 BTC for a standard Bitcoin transaction). Second, businesses might want to pay their own employees, suppliers or contractors in Bitcoin; this is particularly attractive if they need to make the payments across international borders.

There is also another interesting argument for offering low prices in Bitcoin, one that is particularly attractive to sellers of zero-marginal-cost goods like digital downloads (eg. songs, movies, e-books). The argument is this: when a customer pays for a product, the customer is not just paying the listed price; rather, they are also paying the hidden “transaction cost” of having to enter their credit card details and provide their personal information. This cost is the same regardless of whether the good in question costs 49 dollars or 49 cents. The result of this hidden cost is that it dampens the effectiveness of offering low prices. For example, imagine that a company is offering e-books for download at $0.99 each. Should the company drop the price to $0.49 each? The standard answer is, if the price drop brings at least twice as many customers in, then yes. In reality, there are distorting factors, as authors naturally want to get their work out to more people if possible both for marketing and altruistic reasons, but these discrepancies do not overturn the fundamental validity of this argument.

Now, imagine that the “hidden transaction cost” described above is something that consumers value at $1. Will a de-facto price drop from $1.99 to $1.49 bring enough customers in to justify the reduced price? Probably not. However, buying with Bitcoin is more efficient than buying with a credit card; if you have a smartphone wallet, a scanning a QR code and clicking “Send” is all you need. Browser extensions even exist that let you pay with Bitcoin directly from your browser. Finally, when making a Bitcoin transaction much less privacy is lost. If this drops the “hidden transaction cost” to $0.20, you are now dealing with a de-facto price drop of $1.19 to $0.69 – a considerably larger price drop in proportion, and thus one that is more likely to convince enough extra customers to buy to justify the fifty-percent revenue loss on each one. Thus, for that particular e-book store, offering books for $0.99 in fiat and $0.49 in Bitcoin may actually be the best strategy. Most of the time, the discount justified by this reasoning will not be quite so drastic, but twenty or thirty percent off with BTC is certainly quite reasonable.

For the success of the Bitcoin economy in general, promoting the “cheaper in Bitcoin” movement is simply crucial. Bitcoin has a considerable number of merchants accepting it – very few if you simply browse randomly, but enough that an increasing number of people are living their entire lives with it. But what the Bitcoin economy also needs is consumers. Right now, in many parts of the world, including the United States, bitcoins are unfortunately difficult to acquire; so much so, that in-person meetups are becoming an increasingly popular way to buy and sell them. Merchants offering goods cheaper in Bitcoin will help bring some of the advantages that Bitcoin offers to the consumer as well.

Bitcoin Group Therapy in Berlin Tomorrow

Yesterday Room77, the original Bitcoin-accepting restaurant and now world-renowned Bitcoin hub of Berlin, had a successful monthly meetup with dozens of people coming from both Berlin and around the world attending. Bitcoin.de‘s Oliver Flaskamper, Defense Distributed’s Cody Wilson, stateless political activist Mike Gogulski, libbitcoin developer Amir Taaki and Mihai and myself from Bitcoin Magazine were all present, along with many others. Now, Room77’s Joerg Platzer has announced that there will be another Bitcoin event taking place tomorrow – an event which he has dubbed “Bitcoin Group Therapy”.

The plan is as follows: at 15:00 everyone will meet at Room77 (map), and together the group will decide whether to stay at Room77 or take a twenty-minute walk to the nearby Tempelhof Airport airfield and gather in the sun. Wherever the meeting will be, everyone will be able to talk to the group for 5-10 minutes, followed by a brief question and answer session. The idea is for everyone to have a chance to get the word out about their projects, old and new alike, explaining what they are currently doing and what their plans and visions are. Equally importantly, the speeches will be an opportunity to ask for help; whether your project needs another developer, a translator, legal support or even investment, there will likely be people there who have, or are, exactly what you need. Even those who do not have projects of their own are encouraged to attend; the event will be a great opportunity to learn about what Bitcoin users from Berlin and around the world are doing, and perhaps it may even be the place where you find your new job.

After the speeches, the event will simply become an informal party, and everyone will be free to talk among themselves about whatever they wish. One local Bitcoin user is setting up a barbecue, and those who prefer to follow their own path may wish to have dinner in one of the many Bitcoin-accepting restaurants in Berlin; all of them would be glad to have your support. Hope to see you at Room77!

2013 NYC Inside Bitcoins Conference: When Venture Capitalist Meets Bitcoin

Bitcoin Magazine was proud to serve as a sponsor for the 2013 Inside Bitcoins Conference in New York City on Tuesday, July 30 at the Hotel New Yorker.  Mediabistro ran the conference and drew in several hundred Bitcoin Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists.  Taking place in the financial and exchange hub of the world, creative minds came together on Tuesday to discuss the tremendous potential of Bitcoin and the continual shift to digital currencies.

23 year old BitInstant CEO, Charlie Shrem, opened up the morning to highlight that Bitcoin is, “cash with wings.”  Schrem started BitInstant with an initial investment from his mother of 10,000 USD.  Now Shrem has an opportunity to attract investors a bit farther away from home.

Jaron Lukasiewicz, CEO of Coinsetter, followed to contrast the promise of Bitcoin with the challenges posed by the currently outdated financial regulatory structure.  With previous experience in startup ticketing, Lukasiewicz highlighted that Bitcoin is the dominant virtual currency and through his new leveraged forex trading platform, Coinsetter, hopes to facilitate expedient money transfer.  With high hopes for a dominant cryptocurrency, Lukasiewicz stands behind Bitcoin and hopes to bring greater liquidity into the Bitcoin system.

Manu Sporny, founder and CEO of Digital Bazaar, followed to share of his W3C Web Payments group’s work to analyze a new API for performing payments via web browsers and other web based devices.  Manu has continued to forge the trail in creating open standards and open technology to integrate payments into the core architecture of the web.

Three panel discussions followed on Gold 2.0. The VC Take Bitcoin, Bitcoin and Freedom of Speech, and Legal and Regulatory Issues Facing Virtual Currency Businesses.  Panelists discussed the shift in focus from gold to Bitcoin and the ability to utilize the currency to donate to journalists, publishers, political groups and whistleblowers freely.  As a, “censorship resistant currency,” according to John Perry Barlow of the Freedom of Press Foundation, Bitcoin promotes and acts as a form of free speech.  The final panel including James White, Director of Tax Issues for the US Government Accountability Office, touched upon financial regulation and any boundaries to heed to when developing bitcoin software.

The day concluded with insight from BitPay Co-Founder and CEO, Tony Gallippi, ZipZap, Inc. Founder and CEO, Alan Safahi, DirectPayNet President, Maria Sparagis, Let’s Talk Bitcoin! Editor-in-Chief, Adam B. Levine, and Spotify Head of Special Projects, Shakil Khan and American Banker Executive Editor, Marc Hochstein.

The next Inside Bitcoins Conference is already scheduled to take place in Las Vegas on December 10-11.  Bitcoin Magazine truly appreciated those of you who took time during the conference to stop by our table and say hello.  We look forward to meeting you at the next conference!

 

 

Bitcoin: An International Currency for International Communities

This article was originally published in Strike Magazine, a quarterly publication dedicated to “politics, philosophy, art, subversion and sedition”. The magazine frequently features anti-capitalist, anarchist and counter-culture themes from a variety of angles. Strike has released three issues so far: The F*cked Issue, The Sedition Edition and, most recently, The Summer Of. Most recently, Strike has begun accepting Bitcoin for sales, and has just announced its first Bitcoin-paying customer. If you are interested, read more at strikemag.org

In the past two weeks I received two paychecks. The first was for 7.6365 BTC, from an employer in Romania for doing some programming work. The three other programmers I was working with were based in England, Israel and China. The second, for 4.16 BTC, was from Bitcoin Magazine, a company with its chief editor in the EU, its CEO and the person in charge of marketing in Atlanta, and myself in Toronto, Canada. When my friends ask about the magazine, one of the questions they always ask is “where are the offices?”, or “where is your company based?”. And to this, I have come up with a snappy, succinct answer: “we’re based in the cloud.” And it’s true: every day, we communicate over Skype, share files over email, Mega and Google Docs, and, of course, send and receive money using Bitcoin. And once everything is put together, the thousands of kilometres separating us from each other fade into insignificance.

The story is a common one in the Bitcoin world. Many Bitcoin businesses were built by a team of founders living on completely different continents who first found each other on an internet forum, and through years of hard work, determination, enjoyment and suffering, and the sometimes chaotic ups and downs of the Bitcoin market, have become not just lifelong partners, but also true friends. It’s true that, in theory, most of the transactions that have been conducted with Bitcoin could have also been done with Paypal, bank transfers or Western Union; in practice, however, in my own experience and that of hundreds of thousands of others, Bitcoin wins by miles.

Part of the difference can be explained by Bitcoin’s intrinsic properties: its fees are indeed much lower; its semi-anonymous and uncontrolled nature allows innovative businesses to grow without fear of getting arbitrarily shut down by Paypal or the banks; and as far as convenience goes, “Give me an address” followed by pasting the Bitcoin address into the “To:” field of a Bitcoin wallet and clicking “Send” is hard to beat. There is, however, another effect at play. If Bitcoin was just about cutting a few percent out of merchants’ transaction fees, simplifying payment forms or breaking the monopoly of the banks, then businesses and landlords would not be giving 20% discounts for making a transaction with Bitcoin when that transaction could just as easily, and legally, have been carried out via cash or Paypal.

Aside from being an often superior method of payment, Bitcoin has also come to serve another function: that of a signalling device. By accepting Bitcoin, what thousands of merchants, employers and employees are saying is: I support the ideals behind Bitcoin, including internationality, decentralisation, individual liberty and the power of technology to make the world a better place, and I want to interact with other people who share those values. When two Bitcoin users meet at a meetup – the Bitcoin conference in San Jose, say – or online, each one immediately knows that the other shares a similar background of basic knowledge, has been through the same experiences – watching the fluctuating Bitcoin markets rise and fall – and shares, at a deep level, a fundamentally similar worldview, even if fairly substantial political disagreements can sometimes hide this fact on the surface. In short, the Bitcoin economy is a perfect fit for the very definition of a community. The difference is, the community in question is not a community of circumstance, but an intentional, voluntary community of ideals – and a community in which anyone can participate..

The idea of such an international, self-organising business community is not new. Thinkers such as Kevin Carson, David de Ugarte and Doug Casey have all come forward to promote the concept and have even given it a name: phyles. A phyle is essentially a transnational community that, as Doug Casey puts it, “is self-defined by whatever values they share.” Phyles would not be based in any one country, although they may have bases in every country, which their members can go to for help. Phyles can be formal or informal to any degree, ranging from a community whose members do not even realise its existence to a fully fledged institutional structure with its own social welfare provisions and tax system.

The possibilities that phyles may bring are unlimited: some see them as the future of cultural development, and many of their more radical proponents see them becoming the dominant form of economic organisation, transcending both traditional corporations and governments in importance.

Bitcoin’s relationship with the concept of phyles is a complex one. Not only is Bitcoin, as a community, itself a phyle, but also, as a currency, it has all the right properties to make it the perfect currency for any phyle to use. Bitcoin does not discriminate on the basis of ideology, race, sex, or religion, it works equally well in any country and across countries, and it does not rely on any existing institution. It is also proving to be a particularly successful currency for making monetary donations – a surprising fact, given that traditional economics teaches that deflation like that built into Bitcoin can only lead to hoarding.

Another property that phyles will have is inter-operability. Unlike nations, which often strive to be insular groups that protect their own even at the expense of outsiders, phyles are intrinsically designed to interact. One can be a member of several phyles at the same time, and phyles will often find it in their interest to pool their unique resources and cooperate on common projects. This, once again, is a property that Bitcoin is perfectly suited for. There are now about half a dozen major “alternative cryptocurrencies” under development that take Bitcoin’s basic features but make substantial modifications to suit their own needs, but under the hood these currencies all speak the same ‘language’. they all use elliptic curve cryptography, atomic transactions and ‘triple-entry accounting’ as fundamental building blocks of their security, and so systems designed for one such currency can easily be adapted to work for any other. Transaction mechanisms that work across currencies are also very possible.

We can see Bitcoin integrating into other communities already. At the conferences so far, we have seen the Free State Project, the civil liberties community, open source software developers and many more smaller groups. Many of the organisations present have benefitted from thousands of dollars worth of Bitcoin donations, and continue to receive many more every week. The next Bitcoin conference, coming this November, is explicitly intended to further this agenda. The conference will bring Bitcoin advocates together with activists of all stripes from around the world, aiming for a general theme of reforming all institutions of society from the ground up – hence the conference’s name, “unSYSTEM”.

Of course, this is only the start. Some organisations have now taken the plunge and reformed themselves to operate on Bitcoin entirely, and more will likely follow suit as the currency continues to expand and its underlying technologies and businesses develop. The next step may be for other more formal phyles to establish their own currencies; so far, the one major attempt to do this is Stan Stalnaker’s Hub Culture, but experiments like Bitcoin (and its cousins, like Ripple and Freicoin) will likely lead the way for more organisations to attempt to do the same thing. The best ones will not be quite so intentional: making a community just for the sake of making a community rarely works out in practice if there are no underlying values that bond the community together. Internet-based transnational currencies and internet-empowered transnational communities are, to paraphrase Epiphyte spokesman Edan Yago, two mutually reinforcing ideas whose time has come. All that’s left is to implement them.